TABLE 8.

One way Anova analysis of growth performance of birds at 7 and 14 d in experiment #1.

Treatment	BW	cFCR	cFI	cMort	cPI
d7
T1: DL-Met (5% Low TSAA) + ITM	0.169*	1.008*	0.130*	1.25	236.1*
T2, HMTBa (5% Low TSAA) + ITM	0.173	1.015*	0.135	0.00	243.3
T3: DL-Met (5% Low TSAA) + MMHAC	0.173	1.000*	0.134	2.50	238.5*
T4: HMTBa (5% Low TSAA) + MMHAC	0.170*	1.009*	0.132*	3.75	232.0*
T5: DL-Met (5% High TSAA) + ITM	0.174	1.009*	0.136	1.25	243.1
T6: HMTBa (5% High TSAA) + ITM	0.169*	1.017*	0.132*	1.25	234.9*
T7: DL-Met (5% High TSAA) + MMHAC	0.182	1.006*	0.142	1.25	256.0
T8: HMTBa (5% High TSAA) + MMHAC	0.180	1.002*	0.140	0.00	256.5
T9: HMTBa (5% High TSAA) + MMHAC, no challenge	0.180	0.976	0.140	1.25	259.5
SEM	0.003	0.008	0.002	1.24	6.3
p value	0.0141	0.0488	0.0084	0.5430	0.0135
d14
T1: DL-Met (5% Low TSAA) + ITM	0.444*	1.171*	0.473*	1.25	267.7*
T2: HMTBa (5% Low TSAA) + ITM	0.453*	1.192*	0.491*	1.25	269.2*
T3: DL-Met (5% Low TSAA) + MMHAC	0.463*	1.161*	0.491*	2.50	278.3*
T4: HMTBa (5% Low TSAA) + MMHAC	0.455*	1.176*	0.488*	6.25	259.4*
T5: DL-Met (5% High TSAA) + ITM	0.467*	1.168*	0.500	2.50	278.6*
T6: HMTBa (5% High TSAA) + ITM	0.456*	1.161*	0.483*	1.25	277.3*
T7: DL-Met (5% High TSAA) + MMHAC	0.494	1.163*	0.526	1.25	299.5
T8: HMTBa (5% High TSAA) + MMHAC	0.478	1.166*	0.511	0.00	293.2
T9: HMTBa (5% High TSAA) + MMHAC, no challenge	0.506	1.124	0.524	1.25	317.4
SEM	0.011	0.011	0.010	1.49	9.1
p value	0.0016	0.0054	0.0030	0.2087	0.0007

*Statistical different (p ≤ 0.05) from un-challenged control (T9) by Dunnett’s test.