Table 3.
Analytical methods for yeast determination.
| Objective | Method | Observations | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viability determination | Methylene Blue dye Reduction Test (MBRT) | Non-viable cells are dyed blue. High variability. Response times of 48 h. | (Bapat et al., 2006; Dale, 1941) |
| A commercial kit was reduced by cellular dehydrogenases to an orange formazan product soluble in a buffer. | The amount of formazan produced was directly proportional to the number of living cells. Response time 3 h. Maximum determination 1 × 107 cell mL−1. | Kwolek-mirek & Zadrag-tecza (2014) | |
| Cell count hemacytometer method | Inexpensive analysis, easy to carry out, but introduces high variability and low reproducibility. Linear ranges de 5.0 × 104–1.0 × 107 cell mL−1. R2 = 0.9992. | (Fiorino et al., 2004; Lawrence, 2002) | |
| Suspension inoculated on solid YPD medium. | Response time 48 h, possible errors due to dilution and final count. | Kwolek-Mirek & Zadrag-Tecza (2014) | |
| Vitality determination | Acidification power test. | The change in pH caused by the yeast as it degrades a substrate (glucose) is measured. R2 = 0.9430. | Kara et al. (1988) |
| The spectrophotometric method is based on the reaction of luciferin with ATP in the presence of luciferase, Mg2+ ions, and oxygen, resulting in the emission of light. | The analysis must be carried out very quickly, since the physiological conditions of the sample change drastically once taken, affecting the reaction. | Kwolek-Mirek & Zadrag-Tecza (2014) | |
| Estimation of microbial biomass | Gravimetric method. Dry weights |
The drying process may take time, and the preparation difficult. The presence of adsorbed non-microbial substances can interfere. | Harris & Kell (1985) |
| Spectrophotometric method | It determines the turbidity associated with the microorganism's presence. The number and size of cells influences the measure. Response time 7 h. Linear range (0.0–1.0) g L−1. Sensibility 0.63 g L−1. R2 = 0.9994. Error 1.22%. | Hernández & Marín (2002) | |
| Cell count | Flow cytometric method | It analyzes the scattered and fluorescent signals produced by a cell passing through a light beam. It provides automated data but is expensive and requires specialized personnel and high aseptic conditions. It is more directed to the medical field. | (Bochner et al., 1989; Lawrence, 2002; Michelson AL, 1996) |
| Electrochemistry, chronoamperometric method (CA). Cell count of S. cerevisiae and Lactobacillus fermentum. | Measurement of the current generated by microorganisms on a platinum anode covered with a cellulose dialysis membrane. A linear relationship between current and cell number, below 4.0 × 108 cells mL−1. Error 5.0%. | (T Matsunaga et al., 1979) | |
| Electrochemistry, differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). | The current measurement employed a graphite electrode modified with 4,4′-bipyridine. Linear range (0.03–2.00) x 108 cells mL−1. | (Matsunaga and Namba, 1984b) | |
| Measurement of microorganism populations | Electrochemistry cyclic voltammetry (CV). | GCE modified with tetracycline. Linear range (2.0–5.0) x104 cells mL−1. | Han et al. (2000) |
| Electrochemistry cyclic voltammetry (CV). | Graphite working electrode vs. SCE. Linear range (0.1–1.9) x108 cell mL−1. Peak currents were reproducible, error of 4%. | (Matsunaga and Namba, 1984a) | |
| Electrochemistry chronoamperometry method (CA). | GCE modified with 2,3,5 - TBQ. Range lineal (6.4 × 103–1.6 × 106) cells mL−1. | Tsukatani et al. (2003) | |
| Electrochemistry chronoamperometry method (CA). | Screen-printed electrodes modified with magnetic nanoparticles. Linear range 1.0–1.0 × 104 CFU mL−1. LOD 5.0 UFC mL−1 | Villalonga et al. (2019) | |
| Cellular density determination | Electrochemistry chronoamperometry method (CA). | GCE modified with oxidized multi-wall carbon nanotubes dispersed in water – Nafion® (GCE/OMWCNT-N). Range lineal 3.36–6.52 g L−1. LOD 0.98 g L−1, LOQ 3.36 g L−1. R 0.99. | Acevedo Restrepo et al. (2022) |
| Electrochemistry chronoamperometry method (CA). | SPCE modified with oxidized multi-wall carbon nanotubes dispersed in water – Nafion® (SPCE/OMWCNT-N). Range lineal 0.61–7.69 g L−1. LOD 0.17 g L−1, LOQ 0.61 g L−1. R 0.99. | This work |
1YPD: Culture medium of yeast extract, peptone, and dextrose.
22,3,5-TBQ: 2,3,5-trimetil-1,4-benzoquinona. Redox mediator.