Table 4.
Logit estimates of the drivers of empowerment domains.
| Variables | Resource |
Leadership |
Time |
Production |
Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean marginal effects | |||||
| Commercialization (score 0–1) | 0.079 (0.069) | 0.089 (0.071) | −0.205∗∗∗(0.076) | 0.184 (0.111) | 0.283∗∗∗ (0.073) |
| Education of the household head (years) | 0.004 (0.006) | 0.021∗∗∗ (0.005) | 0.006 (0.006) | -0.007 (0.007) | −0.005 (0.005) |
| Access to government extension services (yes = 1) | −0.012 (0.032) | 0.095∗∗ (0.043) | −0.014 (0.045) | 0.048 (0.037) | 0 .116∗∗∗ (0.029) |
| Value of assets (log KES) | 0.064∗∗∗ (0.020) | 0.068∗∗∗ (0.023) | 0.021 (0.018) | 0.094∗∗∗ (0.025) | 0.048∗∗ (0.021) |
| Social network intensity (number) | −0.004∗∗ (0.002) | 0.004∗∗ (0.002) | −0.005∗∗∗ (0.002) | 0.002 (0.002) | 0.001 (0.001) |
| Marital status (married = 1) | −0.082 (0.071) | −0.002 (0.106) | −0.040 (0.100) | 0.157 (0.107) | −0.015 (0.085) |
| Gender of household head (man = 1) | 0.030 (0.062) | −0.007 (0.109) | 0.071 (0.104) | 0.291∗∗∗ (0.112) | 0.258∗∗∗ (0.055) |
| Observations | 815 | 815 | 815 | 815 | 815 |
| Wald Chi2 | 17.13∗∗∗ | 71.11∗∗∗ | 13.91∗∗ | 131.01∗∗∗ | 77.31 |
| Pseudo R2 | 2% | 6% | 2% | 12% | 11% |
Notes: Standard errors are in parentheses and clustered at the group level. Significance levels are reported at the 1% (∗∗∗) and 5% (∗∗) levels. Dependent variables are adequacy dummies for each of the empowerment domains. Exchange rate was 1 US$ = 100 KES.