Skip to main content
. 2000 Feb;68(2):791–795. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.2.791-795.2000

TABLE 3.

Protective efficacies of different ST-CF and ESAT-6 subunit vaccines

Vaccinea Log10 resistanceb
Spleen Liver Lung
Expt 1
 ST-CF + MPL 0.10 (±0.08) 0.07 (±0.10)
 ST-CF + DDA 0.69 (±0.10)* 1.09 (±0.04)*
 ST-CF + DDA–MPL 0.93 (±0.11)* 1.30 (±0.11)*
 BCG 1.29 (±0.09)* 1.33 (±0.10)*
Expt 2
 MPL <0.05  <0.05 
 DDA <0.05  <0.05 
 DDA + MPL <0.05  0.10 (±0.11)
 ESAT-6 + MPL <0.05  0.21 (±0.12)
 ESAT-6 + DDA 0.16 (±0.15) 0.14 (±0.10)
 ESAT-6 + DDA–MPL 0.67 (±0.17)* 0.85 (±0.13)*
 BCG 1.25 (±0.19)* 0.70 (±0.15)*
Expt 3
 DDA + MPL <0.05  <0.05 
 ESAT-6 + DDA–MPL 0.89 (±0.32)* 0.50 (±0.09)*
 BCG 0.94 (±0.24)* 0.46 (±0.09)*
a

Mice were vaccinated once with BCG or three times at 2-week intervals with the subunit vaccines. 

b

Expressed as log10 reductions in the bacterial loads measured in the spleen and lung 6 weeks after aerosol challenge (experiments 2 and 3) or in the spleen and liver 2 weeks after i.v. (experiment 1). TB infection and compared to those in the adjuvant controls. Data are means based on duplicate analysis of five animals in each group. Asterisks, bacterial loads significantly different from those in control mice.