Skip to main content
. 2021 May 15;142(6):328–337. doi: 10.1177/17579139211006747

Table 2.

Leverage points – alignment between Meadows,14 Malhi et al.,16 Senge15 and the ASM

Meadows’ 12 Points to Intervene Intervention Level Framework Iceberg Model ASM
−Degree of leverage + Power to transcend paradigms Paradigm Mental models Beliefs
Paradigm that the system arises out of
Goals of the system Goals System structures Goals
Power to add, change, evolve, or self-organise system structure System structures Structures
Rules of the system
Structure of information flow
Gain around driving positive feedback loops Feedback loops and delays Patterns
Strength of negative feedback loops
Length of delays
Structure of material stocks and flows Structural elements Events Events
Size of buffers and other stabilising stocks
Constants, parameters and numbers

ASM: Action Scales Model.

The alignment between the three models is not as distinct as presented here. For example, Malhi et al.16 suggest that ‘the rules of the system’ and ‘information flows’ may also be viewed as ‘structural elements’ if they relate to a particular sub-system or actor within the system.