Skip to main content
. 2019 May 8;137(1):75–81. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.031040119

Table 3. Comparisons of bone mineral density (BMD) after nine months of follow-up, between the boys and girls (n = 48).

BMD (g/cm2) Boys (n = 24) Girls (n = 24) Sex PHV LST Sport
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) P-value
Upper limbs 0.766 (0.122) 0.747 (0.095) 0.175 --- --- ---
Spine 0.968 (0.145) 1.001 (0.176) 0.238 --- --- ---
Lower limbs 1.163 (0.139) 1.110 (0.118) 0.481 --- --- ---
Whole body 1.058 (0.100) 1.053 (0.105) 0.535 --- --- ---
BMD (g/cm2) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Effect size determined through ANCOVA (eta-squared [ES-r])
Upper limbs 0.724 (0.967 to 0.750) 0.790 (0.764 to 0.817) 0.171* 0.001 0.807* 0.045
Spine 0.900 (0.850 to 0.950) 1.070 (1.020 to 1.121) 0.275* 0.019 0.681* 0.053
Lower limbs 1.106 (1.062 to 1.151) 1.168 (1.123 to 1.212) 0.059 0.028 0.616* 0.016
Whole body 1.006 (0.974 to 1.038) 1.106 (1.074 to 1.139) 0.241* 0.070 0.681* 0.005

*Denotes covariate with P-value < 0.05. SD = standard deviation; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; PHV = peak height velocity; LST = lean soft tissue.