Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 15;137(2):169–176. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0363070219

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses on the association between the percentage energy contribution towards total energy intake that came from ultra-processed foods (in terciles) and the serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), ELSA-Brasil (2008-2010).

Males
Ultra-processed foods Model 0 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
ARM (95% CI) ARM (95% CI) ARM (95% CI) ARM (95% CI) ARM (95% CI)
Tercile 1 (lowest) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Tercile 2 0.95 (0.87-1.03) 0,97 (0.89-1.05) 0.99 (0.91-1.08) 0.98 (0.90-1.07) 0.98 (0.90-1.07)
Tercile 3 (highest) 0.85 (0.77-0.92)***& 0,88 (0.81-0.96)**& 0.93 (0.85-1.02) 0.93 (0.84-1.02) 0.93 (0.84-1.02)
Females
Ultra-processed foods Model 0 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
ARM (95% CI) ARM (95% CI) ARM (95% CI) ARM (95% CI) ARM (95% CI)
Tercile 1 (lowest) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Tercile 2 1.04 (0.95-1.13) 1.04 (0.96-1.14) 1.07 (0.98-1.17) 1.06 (0.98-1.16) 1.01 (0.93-1.10)
Tercile 3 (highest) 1.08 (1.00-1.17)*& 1.09 (1.01-1.19)*& 1.14 (1.04-1.24)**& 1.14 (1.04-1.24)**& 1.00 (0.92-1.08)

Ultra-processed foods: percentage energy contribution towards total energy intake that came from ultra-processed foods, in terciles.

ARM (95% CI) = arithmetic mean ratio and 95% confidence interval estimated using a generalized linear model.

Model 0 = crude analysis; model 1 = adjusted for age (continuous); model 2 = model 1 + race/skin color and educational attainment; model 3 = model 2 + smoking and physical activity; model 4 = model 3 + body mass index (kg/m2).

*P-value < 0.05; **P-value < 0.01; ***P-value < 0.001; &P-value < 0.05 for linear trend in the association between the percentage energy from ultra-processed foods (in terciles) and CRP.