Summary of findings 3. Exercise compared to bright light therapy for adults with depression.
Exercise compared to bright light therapy for adults with depression | |||||
Patient or population: adults with depression Settings: Intervention: Exercise Comparison: bright light therapy | |||||
Outcomes | Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) | No of Participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Assumed risk | Corresponding risk | ||||
Bright light therapy | Exercise | ||||
Symptoms of depression | The mean symptoms of depression in the intervention groups was 6.4 lower (10.2 to 2.6 lower) | 18 (1 study) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low1,2,3 | MD ‐6.40 (95% CI: ‐10.20 to ‐2.60). Although this trial suggests a benefit of exercise, it is too small to draw firm conclusions |
|
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; | |||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate. |
1 Lack of blinding of outcome assessors probably increased effect sizes and drop‐out rates were not reported. Also sequence generation and concealment was considered unclear. 2 The study included was relevant to the review question, particularly given that all studies had to meet the criteria of the ACSM definition of exercise. 3 Based on 18 people