Gary 2010.
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | Depressed people with heart failure (NYHA Class II to III) 42% men Age 30 ‐ 70 |
|
Interventions | 1. Home exercise programme: 12 weekly face‐to‐face home visits to monitor walking and to tailor the exercise prescription. Participants were advised to walk for 3 days per week for 12 weeks, and to increase duration to a maximum of 1 hour for 3 days per week at moderate intensity (n = 20). 2. Home exercise programme plus CBT (n = 18) 3. CBT alone, based on Beck's CBT model. Each session lasted 1 hour. Total number of sessions not stated, but we assume this was 12 because in the combined group they were delivered at the same time as the home exercise programme visits (n = 18) 4. Usual care (n = 17) |
|
Outcomes | HAM‐D, 6‐minute walk | |
Notes | Small sample size | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Reported as randomised, but no details given |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) participants | Unclear risk | Participants were not blinded to treatment allocation; unclear effect on bias |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) those delivering intervention | Unclear risk | Those delivering treatment were not blinded; unclear effect on bias |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) outcome assessors | Low risk | "Data collectors were blind to group assessment" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 68/74 provided outcome data post‐intervention. Classified as high risk, as more than 5% did not provide outcome data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All prespecified outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other source of bias identified |