Hemat‐Far 2012.
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | University students aged 18 ‐ 25 with depression 100% women |
|
Interventions | 1. 40 ‐ 60 minutes of running, 3 times a week, supervised. (n = 10) 2. Control group with no active intervention (n = 10) |
|
Outcomes | Beck Depression Inventory score | |
Notes | Small sample size (10 participants in each arm); specific population under study | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Clinician judgement used at recruitment. After reviewing questionnaires psychiatrists "selected" 20 women |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information given |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) participants | Unclear risk | Participants not blinded to intervention; unclear effect on bias |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) those delivering intervention | Unclear risk | No information given |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) outcome assessors | High risk | Self report BDI |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No discussion on attrition rate |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | BDI specified at outset and completed in results |
Other bias | High risk | The control group were told not to do so much exercise. |