Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 12;2013(9):CD004366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004366.pub6

Hemat‐Far 2012.

Methods RCT
Participants University students aged 18 ‐ 25 with depression
100% women
Interventions 1. 40 ‐ 60 minutes of running, 3 times a week, supervised. (n = 10)
2. Control group with no active intervention (n = 10)
Outcomes Beck Depression Inventory score
Notes Small sample size (10 participants in each arm); specific population under study
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Clinician judgement used at recruitment. After reviewing questionnaires psychiatrists "selected" 20 women
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information given
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 participants Unclear risk Participants not blinded to intervention; unclear effect on bias
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 those delivering intervention Unclear risk No information given
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 outcome assessors High risk Self report BDI
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No discussion on attrition rate
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk BDI specified at outset and completed in results
Other bias High risk The control group were told not to do so much exercise.