Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 12;2013(9):CD004366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004366.pub6

Mather 2002.

Methods RCT (parallel group)
Participants Primary care, psychiatric services, advertisement in paper and radio. N = 86 (59 women and 27 men). Mean age 63.7 (range 53 ‐ 78) in exercise and 66.2 (56 ‐ 91) in control group.
Interventions 1. Endurance, muscle strengthening and stretching, in a group exercise class, lasting 45 minutes. An instructress ran the class from a podium in the centre of a hall (n = 43). Twice weekly for 10 weeks
2. Health education classes (n = 43), twice weekly for 10 weeks
Outcomes 1. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
 2. Geriatric Depression Scale
 3. Clinical Global Impression
 4. Patient Global Impression
Notes Outcome assessor blind
 Intention‐to‐treat
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated random number list
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 participants Unclear risk Participants not blind, unclear effect on bias
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 those delivering intervention Unclear risk Those delivering intervention aware of allocation, unclear effect on bias
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 outcome assessors Low risk Primary outcome was HRSD delivered by one of 2 psychiatrists who were blinded to treatment allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No drop‐outs
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk All prespecified outcome measures reported, but no protocol
Other bias Unclear risk Unclear