Mather 2002.
Methods | RCT (parallel group) | |
Participants | Primary care, psychiatric services, advertisement in paper and radio. N = 86 (59 women and 27 men). Mean age 63.7 (range 53 ‐ 78) in exercise and 66.2 (56 ‐ 91) in control group. | |
Interventions | 1. Endurance, muscle strengthening and stretching, in a group exercise class, lasting 45 minutes. An instructress ran the class from a podium in the centre of a hall (n = 43). Twice weekly for 10 weeks 2. Health education classes (n = 43), twice weekly for 10 weeks |
|
Outcomes | 1. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 2. Geriatric Depression Scale 3. Clinical Global Impression 4. Patient Global Impression | |
Notes | Outcome assessor blind Intention‐to‐treat | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated random number list |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sealed envelopes |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) participants | Unclear risk | Participants not blind, unclear effect on bias |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) those delivering intervention | Unclear risk | Those delivering intervention aware of allocation, unclear effect on bias |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) outcome assessors | Low risk | Primary outcome was HRSD delivered by one of 2 psychiatrists who were blinded to treatment allocation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No drop‐outs |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | All prespecified outcome measures reported, but no protocol |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Unclear |