Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 12;2013(9):CD004366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004366.pub6

Setaro 1985.

Methods RCT (parallel group)
Participants Community volunteers recruited via the media
 Age range 18 ‐ 35 (mean age not stated)
 26% women
 N = 150
Interventions 1. Cognitive therapy and aerobic dance classes (n = 30)
 2. Aerobic dance classes only (n = 30)
 3. Cognitive therapy only using the principles of A Beck (n = 30)
 4. Cognitive therapy and non‐aerobic exercise classes (n = 30)
 5. Non‐aerobic exercise only (arts and crafts) (n = 30)
 6. No intervention (n =30)
Duration of interventions was 10 weeks
Outcomes Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
Notes Outcome assessment not blind
 Analysis not intention‐to‐treat
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Participants blocked by gender; male‐female ratios kept constant
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 participants Unclear risk Participants not blind, unclear risk on bias
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 those delivering intervention Unclear risk Group intervention, unclear if those delivering the intervention were blind
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 outcome assessors Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk 180 randomised, 150 completed trial
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Reported prespecified outcomes; no protocol
Other bias Unclear risk Unclear