Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 12;2013(9):CD004366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004366.pub6

Singh 1997.

Methods RCT
Participants Community volunteers from 2 registers of individuals interested in participation in research
 Mean age 70 (range 61 ‐ 88)
 63% women
 N = 32
Interventions 1. Supervised non‐aerobic progressive resistance training 3 times a week for 10 weeks (n = 17)
 2. Control group received health seminars twice a week in which depression and mental health were not discussed (n = 15)
Outcomes 1. Beck Depression Inventory
 2. Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression
Notes Outcome assessment not blind
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated list of blocks of 5
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Assessed by Lawlor and Hopker as adequate
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 participants Unclear risk Participants not blind
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 those delivering intervention Unclear risk Those delivering intervention were not blind
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 outcome assessors High risk Self‐rated BDI
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All completed the study
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk All prespecified outcomes reported, though no protocol
Other bias Unclear risk Unclear