Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 12;2013(9):CD004366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004366.pub6

Veale 1992.

Methods RCT
Participants Psychiatric hospital outpatients and hospital day‐patients
 Mean age 35.5 (range 19 ‐ 58)
 64% women
 N = 83
Interventions 1. Group running 3 times a week for 12 weeks, plus routine care (n = 48)
 2. Control group: routine care only (n = 35)
Outcomes 1. Beck Depression Inventory
 2. State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory
Notes Outcome assessment not blind
 Analysis not intention‐to‐treat
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Adequate (categorised by Lawlor and Hopker)
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 participants Unclear risk Participants not blind, unclear risk
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 those delivering intervention Unclear risk Those delivering the intervention were not blind, but the influence on bias is unclear
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 outcome assessors High risk Self‐reported outcomes
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk A total of 18 dropped out, leaving 65 for analyses
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk All the prespecified outcomes stated in the paper were reported, but no protocol
Other bias Unclear risk unclear