Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 27;27(10):4136–4143. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01671-y

Table 2.

Post hoc t-tests for pairwise contrasts between groups using ROI analysis (Marsbar, see methods).

STUDY AND ROI Contrast 1 Contrast 2 Contrast 3 Contrast 4 Contrast 5 Contrast 6
FAMPATH HV > HR HV > HR-MOOD HV > HR-MOOD+SA HR > HR-MOOD HR > HR-MOOD+SA HR-MOOD > HR-MOOD+SA
t(85) p-val t(85) p-val t(85) p-val t(85) p-val t(85) p-val t(85) p-val
vmPFC 0.69 0.25 3.12 0.001 3.50 0.0004 2.44 0.008 2.83 0.003 0.57 0.29
mOFC 1.37 0.09 3.67 0.0002 3.08 0.001 2.27 0.01 1.75 0.04 −0.40 0.65
SECOND DATASET HV and non-HR patients > “HR”* HV > MOOD HV > MOOD+SA N/A N/A MOOD > MOOD+SA
diff p-val t(87) p-val t(87) p-val t(87) p-val
vmPFC 0.11 0.16 0.21 0.42 −0.14 0.56 0.11 0.46
mOFC 0.08 0.37 −0.71 0.76 0.29 0.39 0.42 0.34
*

The diff column lists the difference in medians between the two groups, and p-val is based on a Mann-Whitney U-test. See Figure 1A (right panel) and Figure 1B for voxel-wise results when using an anatomic ROI and small volume cluster-extent correction.

vmPFC=dorsal cluster in Figure 1, top row; mOFC=ventral cluster in Figure 1, bottom row; All reported p-values in the table are one-sided since we hypothesized specific directions in the second independent dataset based on FAMPATH dataset results.