Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Nutr. 2022 Oct 4;41(12):2607–2613. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.09.016

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics by SAT Radiodensity Groups

SAT Radiodensity
Characteristicsa Low (N = 318) Middle (N = 2,183) High (N = 367) P valueb
Age (years) 58.0 (28.0–65.0) 56.0 (48.0–64.0) 58.0 (45.0–69.0) 0.03
Race and Ethnicity 0.05
 Non-Hispanic White 220 (69.2) 1,351 (61.9) 245 (66.8)
 Black 18 (5.7) 164 (7.5) 32 (8.7)
 Hispanic 38 (11.9) 259 (11.9) 32 (8.7)
 Asian/Pacific Island 42 (13.2) 393 (18.0) 57 (15.5)
 Others 0 (0) 16 (0.7) 1 (0.3)
Stage 0.09
 I 76 (23.9) 448 (20.5) 95 (25.9)
 II 135 (42.5) 1,005 (46.0) 167 (45.5)
 III 107 (33.6) 730 (33.4) 105 (28.6)
ER 0.06
 ER+ 233 (73.3) 1,653 (75.2) 296 (80.7)
 ER− 85 (26.7) 530 (24.3) 71 (19.3)
PR 0.21
 PR+ 162 (50.9) 1,207 (55.3) 211 (57.5)
 PR− 156 (49.1) 976 (44.7) 156 (42.5)
HER2 0.24
 HER2+ 53 (16.7) 398 (18.2) 58 (15.8)
 HER2− 246 (77.4) 1,612 (73.8) 288 (78.5)
 Unknown 19 (6.0) 173 (7.9) 21 (5.7)
Charlson Comorbidity Index <0.001
 0 228 (71.7) 1,621 (74.3) 252 (68.7)
 1–2 74 (23.3) 471 (21.6) 78 (21.3)
 ≥3 16 (5.0) 91 (4.2) 37 (10.1)
Smoking 0.09
 Current 26 (8.2) 211 (9.7) 51 (13.9)
 Former 93 (29.3) 608 (27.9) 103 (28.1)
 Never 199 (62.6) 1364 (62.5) 213 (58.0)
BMI (kg/m2) <0.001
 <18.5 0 (0) 12 (0.5) 32 (8.7)
 18.5–24.9 61 (19.2) 693 (31.7) 222 (60.5)
 25–29.9 114 (35.9) 743 (34.0) 59 (16.1)
 ≥30 143 (45.0) 735 (33.7) 54 (14.7)
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio 2.3 (1.7–3.0) 2.1 (1.6–3.0) 2.4 (1.7–3.5) <0.001
SAT Areas (cm2) 291.8 (223.6–386.6) 232.4 (170.3–314.7) 109.4 (71.4–191.8) <0.001
VAT Areas (cm2) 125.8 (83.1–181.4) 91.4 (46.2–148.9) 17.3 (7.3–65.7) <0.001

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CT, computed tomography; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; PET/CT, Positron emission tomography/computed tomography; PR, progesterone receptor; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; VAT, visceral adipose tissue.

a

Continuous variables were presented as median (IQR) and categorical variables as Number (%). Percentages may not add up to 100% because of rounding.

b

P values were calculated using the χ2 test for categorical variables and the Kruskal Wallis test for continuous variable.