Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 22;16:1046268. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1046268

TABLE 3.

Classification performance of our proposed method on single-center dataset.

Sites Accuracy (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Precision (%)
NYU 71.4 ± 5.7 75.0 ± 1.5 68.4 ± 9.4 66.7 ± 9.8
OHSU 80.8 ± 3.8 76.9 ± 7.7 84.6 ± 7.7 83.3 ± 8.3
KKI 62.5 ± 8.3 63.6 ± 9.1 61.5 ± 7.7 58.3 ± 8.4
YALE 71.4 ± 3.6 74.0 ± 2.9 68.9 ± 4.4 68.9 ± 2.5
USM 81.6 ± 2.9 84.8 ± 4.1 76.0 ± 0.9 86.6 ± 0.3
Olin 76.4 ± 3.0 75.0 ± 3.9 78.6 ± 1.4 83.3 ± 0.0
Pitt 73.2 ± 1.8 75.0 ± 2.6 71.4 ± 6.4 72.4 ± 5.4
Leuven 74.6 ± 3.2 68.8 ± 5.4 80.6 ± 0.7 78.6 ± 0.7
UCLA 79.5 ± 3.1 77.8 ± 3.7 75.0 ± 2.3 79.2 ± 2.3
Caltech 67.6 ± 2.7 71.4 ± 0.0 62.5 ± 6.3 71.4 ± 3.6
CMU 66.7 ± 3.6 64.3 ± 7.1 69.2 ± 0.0 69.2 ± 2.2
MaxMun 65.4 ± 3.8 69.2 ± 0.3 61.5 ± 6.7 64.3 ± 4.9
SBL 66.7 ± 3.4 71.4 ± 1.2 62.7 ± 6.2 62.5 ± 4.9
SDSU 61.6 ± 2.7 60.1 ± 5.7 67.9 ± 3.8 65.6 ± 3.2
Stanford 67.7 ± 4.2 51.6 ± 5.7 76.9 ± 5.3 64.2 ± 3.7
UM 63.8 ± 5.6 70.5 ± 4.3 53.2 ± 5.7 75.6 ± 4.9
Trinity 68.8 ± 5.5 72.9 ± 4.6 60.5 ± 5.7 73.3 ± 3.7
AVERAGEE 70.6 ± 4.0 71.7 ± 4.1 69.4 ± 4.8 71.7 ± 4.0