Table 1.
Clinical characteristic of the study groups.
| Clinical Parameters | NMS-LF–(n=22) | NMS-LF+ (n=22) | MS-LF- (n=21) | MS-LF+ (n=23) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 35 ± 15.3 | 37 ± 16.8 | 46 ± 11.5**b | 48 ± 11.01 | |
| Sex (m/f) | 13M/9F | 12M/10F | 11M/10F | 9M/14F | |
| TROPBIO | 10.9 ± 18.9 | 3544.4 ± 7105.1*a | 8.9 ± 3.1 | 4414.7 ± 8744.1*c | |
| Waist (cm) | 70 ± 10.7 | 78 ± 9.4**a | 96 ± 11.7***b | 93 ± 11.7 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19 ± 3.4 | 22 ± 3.9*** a | 28 ± 5.2***b | 25 ± 4.0 | |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 110 ± 8.4 | 108 ± 13.1 | 140 ± 15.5***b | 137 ± 21.1 | |
| Diastolic BP(mm Hg) | 70 ± 9.1 | 70 ± 9.2 | 86 ± 10.2*** b | 83 ± 14.2 | |
| FBS (mg/dl) | 82 ± 5.6 | 86 ± 7.0 | 113 ± 35.6**b | 126 ± 44.2 | |
| PGBS/PPBS | 101 ± 30.5 | 115 ± 36.7 | 191 ± 76.4***b | 224 ± 107.3 | |
| Glycated Haemoglobin (%) | 5 ± 0.5 | 6 ± 0.4 | 7 ± 1.5***b | 7 ± 1.7 | |
| Total Serum Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 167 ± 22.7 | 178 ± 34.5 | 189 ± 34.8*b | 212 ± 40.0*c | |
| Serum triglycerides (mg/dl) | 71 ± 32.7 | 96 ± 36.4* a | 197 ± 6***b | 185 ± 67.7 | |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 51 ± 7.9 | 42 ± 8.1** a | 38 ± 6.8***b | 41 ± 8.3 | |
| LDL- cholesterol (mg/dl) | 101 ± 21.5 | 117 ± 31.6* a | 104 ± 40.0 | 134 ± 36.4** c | |
| Microalbuminuria (mg/dl) | 9 ± 1.6 | 7 ± 4.9 | 15 ± 22.4 | 24 ± 34.9 | |
| Urea | 21 ± 6.4 | 22 ± 5.3 | 20 ± 4.3 | 22 ± 5.1 | |
| Creatinine | 1 ± 0.2 | 1 ± 0.9 | 1 ± 0.1 | 1 ± 0.2 | |
| Diabetes status (%) | NGT-95; PDM-5; NDM-0;KDM-0 | NGT-77; PDM-23; NDM-0;KDM-0 | NGT-14; PDM-62; NDM10; KDM-14 | NGT-26; PDM-30; NDM-22;KDM-22 | |
| Hypertension (%) | |||||
| Systolic BP | 0 | 5 | 76 | 65 | |
| Diastolic BP | 5 | 5 | 76 | 43 | |
| Central obesity (%) | 5 | 23 | 81 | 78 | |
| Hypertriglyceridemia (%) | 5 | 9 | 81 | 70 | |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 9 | 64 | 90 | 83 | |
BMI, Body Mass Index; FBS, Fasting Blood Sugar; PGBS, Post Glucose Blood Sugar/PPBS, Post Prandial Blood Sugar; HDL, High Density Lipoprotein; LDL, Low Density Lipoprotein.
a NMS-LF- vs NMS-LF+, b MS-LF- vs NMS-LF+ and c NMS-LF- vs MS-LF- groups were compared using Student t-test.
Data is shown as mean ± SD for continuous variables. Values highlighted in bold show significant difference.
* <0.05; ** <0.01; *** <0.001.