Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 3;128(12):2409–2420. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522000460

Table 4.

Cognitive function tasks before and after supplementation with tart Montmorency cherries or an isoenergetic placebo

(Mean values and standard deviations)

Measure Treatment n Baseline 3 months
Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 1 Rep 2 Mixed model
Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd Effect P-value
DV accuracy (%)* Cherry 45 94·1 5·9 88·2 13·1 95·7 3·5 88·6 11·6 T 0·035
Placebo 93·0 6·0 84·7 14·7 89·0 9·8 85·9 10·3 T × R 0·294
DV RT (ms) Cherry 46 477·8 37·8 492·5 39·5 477·4 33·9 495·3 38·8 T 0·166
Placebo 473·5 31·4 500·1 37·2 484·7 37·5 511·4 34·2 T × R 0·619
DV FA (n)* Cherry 41 2·5 1·9 2·5 2·3 1·4 1·3 3·1 2·3 T 0·005
Placebo 2·5 1·9 3·8 1·9 3·6 2·8 4·5 2·8 T × R 0·182
RVIP accuracy (%) Cherry 42 57·2 17·3 63·0 18·3 63·0 20·9 71·5 15·3 T 0·194
Placebo 50·4 18·7 53·8 17·2 56·3 21·8 56·7 20·5 T × R 0·765
RVIP RT (ms) Cherry 41 555·6 62·1 568·1 50·6 555·5 53·5 549·6 35·0 T 0·539
Placebo 557·9 63·9 540·1 47·3 536·4 51·7 545·1 37·1 T × R 0·351
RVIP FA (n) Cherry 44 5·9 3·8 2·8 1·3 5·5 5·2 3·8 2·6 T 0·955
Placebo 4·9 3·2 5·2 3·8 4·3 3·1 4·7 2·6 T × R 0·786
3-Back accuracy (%) Cherry 40 80·2 5·4 85·3 8·4 79·7 9·1 85·4 9·0 T 0·608
Placebo 76·9 9·3 81·8 8·8 77·5 9·4 83·3 7·9 T × R 0·962
3-Back RT (ms) Cherry 40 1110 231 980 234 1111 248 942 195 T 0·930
Placebo 946 239 901 205 1054 286 920 247 T × R 0·653

DV, digit vigilance; FA, false alarm; RVIP, rapid visual image processing; RT, reaction time; Rep, repetition. Effects are treatment (T) and treatment by repetition interaction (T × R).

*

Significant difference between treatments (P < 0·05).