Table 4.

Confirmatory factor analysis for reduced four factor model

Construct	Item label	Item	Factor loadings	Coefficient alpha	Composite reliability
Psychological safety	SAFE1*	If I make a mistake in this department/unit, it is held against me	.62	.83	.85
	SAFE2	Members of staff in this department are able to bring up problems and tough issues	.82
	SAFE4	I feel safe to take a risk in this department/unit	.76
	SAFE7	In working with members of this department/unit, my unique skills and talents are valued and utilised	.78
Interprofessional collaboration	IPC2	My colleagues share decision-making power with each other	.91	.97	.97
	IPC3	My colleagues are open and honest with each other	.92
	IPC4	My colleagues make changes to our working approaches based on each other’s feedback	.91
	IPC5	My colleagues strive to achieve mutually satisfying resolutions to differences of opinion	.93
	IPC8	My colleagues establish a sense of trust amongst our team members	.94
Quality of care	QOC4	I am able to be responsive to the needs of individual patients	.84	.89	.90
	QOC5	I am able to provide care in a timely manner	.78
	QOC6	I am able to provide care aligned with the currently accepted best practice	.83
	QOC8	I am able to provide care that leads to a positive patient experience	.82
	EFFC1	I am confident that I am able to provide high quality patient care	.63
Clinician engagement	ENGE2	I have the opportunity to participate in decision-making in my organisation	.91	.96	.96
	ENGE4	I have opportunities to collaborate in the process of making changes in my organisation	.94
	ENGE5	My voice is heard in the process of making changes in my organisation	.93
	ENGE6	There are mechanisms for me to take part in decision-making about in my organisation	.93

Note. * Items reverse coded