Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar;68(3):1116–1124. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.3.1116-1124.2000

TABLE 3.

Comparison of results from core OS typing studies

Collection Reference No. (%) of isolates with core type:
Total no.
R1 R2 R3 R4 K-12
ECOR, all isolates This study 50 (69.4) 8 (11.1) 8 (11.1) 2 (2.8) 4 (5.6) 72
ECOR group A This study 11 (44) 7 (28) 2 (8) 1 (4) 4 (16) 25
ECOR group B1 This study 11 (68.8) 5 (31.2) 16
ECOR group B2 This study 15 (100) 15
ECOR group D This study 12 (100) 12
ECOR minor group (group E) This study 1 (25) 1 (25) 1 (25) 1 (25) 4
VTEC This study 8 (12.3) 54 (83.1) 1 (1.5) 2 (3.1) 65
VTEC 6 28 (100) 28
Non-VTEC commensals from cattle and meats This studya 10 (50.0) 2 (10.0) 8 (40.0) 20
This study, adjustedb 10 (58.8) 2 (11.8) 5 (29.4) 17
Human fecal isolates 10 11 (52.4) 4 (19) 2 (9.5) 21
Bacteremic isolates 1 94 (68) 9 (6.5) 12 (8.7) 7 (5.1) 3 (2.2) 138
Septicemic isolates 10 48 (60.8) 6 (7.6) 12 (15.2) 79
UTI isolates 10 64 (80) 4 (5) 4 (5) 80
Gibb et al. study, total 10 123 (68.3) 14 (7.8) 18 (10) 180
a

Includes three isolates that are probably VTEC isolates that have lost the VT genes. 

b

Excludes three isolates that probably have lost their VT genes.