Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 7;2022(12):CD015477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015477
Study  Intervention name Estimate effect Unit of analysis  Time point Type of assay Population 
Ella 2021a Intervention: BBV152  Median (IQR) 55N (22 to 173.80) Number of  SFCs per million PBMCs 28‐D1 IFN‐γ ELISpot 18–55 years
Control: placebo Median (IQR) 3 (1 to 23)
Logunov 2021 Intervention: Gam‐COVID‐Vac  Median (IQR) 32.77 (13.94 to 50.76) IFN‐γ concentration pg/mL 28‐D1 IFN‐γ measured by ELISA ≥ 18 years
Control: placebo Median (IQR)  0.41 (0.11 to 0.85)
Liu 2021 Intervention: ChAdOx1/ BNT162b2  
Geometric mean ratio (95% CI)
 
3.90 (95% CI 2.90 to 5.30)
Number of spot‐forming cells (SFCs) per million PBMCs 28‐D2 IFN‐γ ELISpot ≥ 50 years
Control: ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1
Intervention: BNT162b2/ChAdOx1 1.20 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.70)
Control: BNT162b2/ BNT162b2
Hall 2021 Intervention: mRNA‐1273/mRNA‐1273 boost  Median 432 versus 67; 95% CI for the between‐group difference, 46 to 986 T‐cell counts – cells per million CD4+ T cells 28‐D3 Intracellular cytokine staining Transplant recipients only 
Control: mRNA‐1273/placebo boost Median
Bonelli 2021 Intervention: BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273/ChAdOx1 boost Median (IQR) 459 (133 to 722) Number of SFCs per million PBMCs 7‐D3 IFN‐γ ELISpot People currently receiving rituximab
Control: BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273/BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273 boost Median (IQR) 305 (171 to 416) 
Zhang 2021  Intervention: CoronaVac  Median (Min, Max)  5.50 (0 to 35.70) Number of SFCs per million PBMCs 14‐D2 IFN‐γ ELISpot  18–59 years
Control: placebo Median (Min, Max)  0 (0 to 11.70)
Sablerolles 2021 Intervention: Ad26.COV2.S/mRNA‐1273 boost Percentage of responders 44/48 (91.66%) versus 32/44 (72.72%) (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.96, P = 0.01726)  Number of responders (responder cut‐off is 0.15 IU/mL)  28‐D2 IFN‐y release assay 18–65 years 
Control: Ad26.COV2.S/Ad26.COV2.S boost
Intervention: Ad26.COV2.S/BNT162b2 boost Percentage of responders
 
43/47 (91.48%) versus 32/44 (72.72%) (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.97, P = 0.01946) 
Control: Ad26.COV2.S/Ad26.COV2.S boost
Intervention: Ad26.COV2.S/BNT162b2 boost Percentage of responders 43/47 (91.48%) versus 44/48 (91.66%) (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.13, P = 0.9753) 
Control: Ad26.COV2.S/mRNA‐1273 boost