Study | Intervention name | Estimate effect | Unit of analysis | Time point | Type of assay | Population | |
Ella 2021a | Intervention: BBV152 | Median (IQR) | 55N (22 to 173.80) | Number of SFCs per million PBMCs | 28‐D1 | IFN‐γ ELISpot | 18–55 years |
Control: placebo | Median (IQR) | 3 (1 to 23) | |||||
Logunov 2021 | Intervention: Gam‐COVID‐Vac | Median (IQR) | 32.77 (13.94 to 50.76) | IFN‐γ concentration pg/mL | 28‐D1 | IFN‐γ measured by ELISA | ≥ 18 years |
Control: placebo | Median (IQR) | 0.41 (0.11 to 0.85) | |||||
Liu 2021 | Intervention: ChAdOx1/ BNT162b2 | Geometric mean ratio (95% CI) |
3.90 (95% CI 2.90 to 5.30) |
Number of spot‐forming cells (SFCs) per million PBMCs | 28‐D2 | IFN‐γ ELISpot | ≥ 50 years |
Control: ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 | |||||||
Intervention: BNT162b2/ChAdOx1 | 1.20 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.70) | ||||||
Control: BNT162b2/ BNT162b2 | |||||||
Hall 2021 | Intervention: mRNA‐1273/mRNA‐1273 boost | Median | 432 versus 67; 95% CI for the between‐group difference, 46 to 986 | T‐cell counts – cells per million CD4+ T cells | 28‐D3 | Intracellular cytokine staining | Transplant recipients only |
Control: mRNA‐1273/placebo boost | Median | ||||||
Bonelli 2021 | Intervention: BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273/ChAdOx1 boost | Median (IQR) | 459 (133 to 722) | Number of SFCs per million PBMCs | 7‐D3 | IFN‐γ ELISpot | People currently receiving rituximab |
Control: BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273/BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273 boost | Median (IQR) | 305 (171 to 416) | |||||
Zhang 2021 | Intervention: CoronaVac | Median (Min, Max) | 5.50 (0 to 35.70) | Number of SFCs per million PBMCs | 14‐D2 | IFN‐γ ELISpot | 18–59 years |
Control: placebo | Median (Min, Max) | 0 (0 to 11.70) | |||||
Sablerolles 2021 | Intervention: Ad26.COV2.S/mRNA‐1273 boost | Percentage of responders | 44/48 (91.66%) versus 32/44 (72.72%) (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.96, P = 0.01726) | Number of responders (responder cut‐off is 0.15 IU/mL) | 28‐D2 | IFN‐y release assay | 18–65 years |
Control: Ad26.COV2.S/Ad26.COV2.S boost | |||||||
Intervention: Ad26.COV2.S/BNT162b2 boost | Percentage of responders |
43/47 (91.48%) versus 32/44 (72.72%) (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.97, P = 0.01946) | |||||
Control: Ad26.COV2.S/Ad26.COV2.S boost | |||||||
Intervention: Ad26.COV2.S/BNT162b2 boost | Percentage of responders | 43/47 (91.48%) versus 44/48 (91.66%) (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.13, P = 0.9753) | |||||
Control: Ad26.COV2.S/mRNA‐1273 boost |