Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 2;101(48):e32028. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032028

Table 1.

Table of characteristic study.

No. Author (years) Research location and period Patients age Type of diabetes Current treatment received Type of telemedicine HbA1c level (%)
Base Final visit Change
1. Kim H-S (2007)[20] South Korea (2003–2004) The mean ages were 47.5 ± 9.1 (control group) and 46.8 ± 8.8 (treatment group) T2DM Insulin and oral anti-diabetic medication ● SMS
● Cellular phone or wired Internet
● Website
● Control group: 7.59 ± 1.09
● Intervention group: 8.09 ± 1.72
● Control group: 7.66 ± 0.91
● Intervention group: 6.94 ± 1.04
● Control group: +0.07
● Intervention group: −1.15
2. Sacco WP et al (2009)[21] USA (September 2001–August 2003) 18–65 T2DM with HbA1c level > 6.5% Insulin (53% participants) and oral anti-diabetic medication (86% participants) ● Telephone calls ● Control group: 8.5 ± 2.01
● Intervention group: 8.4 ± 1.37
● Control group: 7.8 ± 1.3
● Intervention group: 7.4 ± 1.12
● Control group: −0.7 ± 0.71
● Intervention group: −1 ± 0.25
3. Marios T et al (2012)[22] Australia (May 2007–October 2010) 18–80 T2DM with FPG > 7.0 mmol·L-1 and HbA1c% level > 6.5. N/A ● Telephone calls ● Control group: 7.53 ± 1.68
● Intervention group: 7.90 ± 2.39
● Control group: 7.12 ± 0.79
● Intervention group: 7.61 ± 2.08
● Control group: −0.41 ± 0.89
● Intervention group: −0.29 ± 0.31
4. Torbjørnsen A et al (2014)[23] Norwegia (2011–2013) ≥18 yr T2DM and HbA1c level ≥ 7.1% included (≥54.1 mmol/mol) ● No medication (9 participants)
● Only oral agents (63 participants)
● Only injections agent (19 participants)
● Combination oral and injection (40 participants)
● FTA
● FTA-HC
● Control group: 8.3
● Intervention group:  ± 
1.FTA: 8.1
2.FTA-HC: 8.2
● Control group: 8.0
● Intervention group: ± 
1.FTA: 7.8
2.FTA-HC: 7.8
● Control group: −0.39
● Intervention group:
1.FTA: −0.23
2.FTA-HC: −0.41
5. Holmen H et al (2014)[24] Norwegia (2011–2013) ≥18 yr T2DM with HbA1c level ≥ 7.1% (≥54.1 mmol/mol) ● Diet only (9 participants)
● Oral agents only (63 participants)
● Injection only (19 participants)
● Combination of oral and injection (40 participants)
● FTA
● FTA-HC
● Control group: 8.4
● Intervention group:
1.FTA: 8.1
2.FTA-HC: 8.1
● Control group: 8.2
● Intervention group: ± 
1.FTA: 7.8
2.FTA-HC: 8.0
● Control group: −0.16
● Intervention group:
1.FTA: −0.31
2.FTA-HC: −0.15
6. Kotsani K et al (2018)[25] Greece (January–August 2016) 18–39 T1DM for at least 1 year MDI ● Telephone calls ● Control group: 8.1 ± 1.2
● Intervention group: 8.3 ± 0.6
● Control group: 7.9 ± 0.8
● Intervention group: 7.8 ± 1
● Control group: −0.2
● Intervention group: −0.5
7. Miremberg H et al (2018)[26] Israel (2016–2017) Women 18–45 years old GDM Insulin injection ● Website ● Control group: 5.2 ± 0.4
● Intervention group: 5.2 ± 0.33
● Control group: 5.5 ± 1.9
● Intervention group: 5.3 ± 1.9
● Control group: +0.3
● Intervention group: +0.1
8. Sung J-H et al (2019)[27] South Korea (February 2017–August 2017) The mean age was 33.43 GDM N/A ● A mobile phone application ● Control group: 33.7 ± 4.3
● Intervention group: 36.64 ± 5.55
● Control group: 36.75 ± 3.24
● Intervention group: 35.57 ± 4.69
● Control group: +3.05
● Intervention group: −1.07
9. Yasmin F et al (2020)[28] Bangladesh (Baseline: January–December 2014; Endline: January–2015) The mean age was 53 and 51 years in the intervention and the control group T2DM N/A ● Mobile phone-based health reminder system
● 24/7 call center services
● Control group: 8.54 (FBG)
● Intervention group: 8.67 (FBG)
● Control group: 8.13 (FBG)
● Intervention group: 6.8 (FBG)
● Control group: −0.41 (FBG)
● Intervention group: −1.87 (FBG)

FBG = fasting blood glucose, FTA = Few Touch Applications, FTA-HC = Few Touch Applications-Health Counseling, GDM = gestational diabetes mellitus, HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin A, MDI = multiple daily injections of insulin, N/A = not applicable, SMS = short message service, T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitus, T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus.