Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Macro Lett. 2022 Mar 21;11(4):460–467. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.2c00053

Table 1:

Materials and micellization data summary.

Polymer Mn [g/mol]a Đ a wt% PEOa wt% NBa CMCa [mg/mL]b Rh [nm]c Rcore [nm]d (calc) Rcore [nm]e (expt)
E450 (PEO-20k) 20000 1.10 100 0 N/A
E76-b-P29-b-E76 (F68)f 8400f 80f 0 70 ± 10f
E103-b-P39-b-E103 (F88)f 11400f 80f 0 6 ± 0.9f
E132-b-P50-b-E132 (F108)f 14600f 80f 0 0.4 ± 0.1f
BB-E45,10-b-BB-P15,5 26200 1.07 72 8 8 ± 3 17 ± 4 5 6 ± 1
BB-E45,20-b-BB-P15,10 55000 1.10 74 8 2 ± 0.5 25 8
BB-E45,160-b-BB-P15,43 394000 1.15 80 7 0.4 ± 0.1 150 30 15 ± 8
a

SEC with multi-angle light scattering detection and Zimm analysis

b

Determined by DLS

c

DLS data reported for 10 mg/mL solution using the second cumulant model. Error is the standard deviation of three independent replicates.

d

Model described in Fig. S16: sum of core forming block’s backbone contour length and twice the radius of gyration of its side chains

e

Determined by cryo-TEM

f

Data from Alexandridis et al. Macromolecules. 1994, 27, 9, 2414–2425 measured via fluorescent dye method.59