Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 20;2(1):e66. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.48

Table 3.

Distribution of Molecular Swabs (RPMS) Classified by Source of Prescription in Workers Stratified by Job Title

Job Title RPMS, Positive/Negative, (%) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
After a Signaling Form For Any Other Reasons
Administratives (n = 824) 19/90 (21) 14/128 (11) 2.2 (1.02–4.6)*
Assistant personnel (n = 1,300) 61/325 (19) 35/509 (7) 3.1 (2.0–4.9)***
Nurses (n = 2,717) 137/729 (19) 98/1,080 (9) 2.3 (1.8–3.1)***
Physicians (n = 2,067) 68/312 (22) 86/697 (12) 2.0 (1.4–2.8)***
Technical operators (n = 289) 6/28 (21) 3/40 (8) 3.4 (0.8–14.8)
Psychologists, speech-language pathologists and social assistants (n = 112) 5/29 (17) 0/15
Other HCWs (n = 784) 38/175 (22) 20/214 (9) 2.7 (1.5–4.8)**
HCWs only (n = 6,980) a 309/1,570 (20) 239/2,515 (10) 2.3 (1.9–2.8)***
Total (n = 8,093) 334/1,688 (20) 256/2,683 (10) 2.3 (1.9–2.8)***

Note. CI, confidence interval; HCW, healthcare worker.

a

Excluding employees, pharmacists, and technical operators.

*P<.05, **P<.01; ***P<.0001.