Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 19;127(12):2241–2248. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-02001-3

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics.

Characteristic Main efficacy analysis population (n = 68) Special-interest efficacy analysis population (n = 42) Safety set (n = 108)
Median age (range), years 53.0 (23.0–72.0) 53.5 (28.0–68.0) 55.0 (23.0–74.0)
Male, n (%) 36 (52.9) 19 (45.2) 55 (50.9)
Han Chinese, n (%) 68 (100) 42 (100) 108 (100)
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, n (%)
  0 25 (36.8) 15 (35.7) 41 (38.0)
  1 43 (63.2) 27 (64.3) 67 (62.0)
 Stage M1, n (%) 67 (98.5) 42 (100) 106 (98.1)
Prior lines of therapy (chemotherapy), n (%)
  1 27 (39.7) 6 (14.3) 30 (27.8)
  2 16 (23.5) 13 (31.0) 29 (26.9)
  ≥3 25 (36.8) 23 (54.8) 49 (45.4)
Primary tumour type, n (%)
  Colorectal cancer 53 (77.9) 28 (66.7) 73 (67.6)
  Endometrial cancer 5 (7.4) 5 (11.9) 8 (7.4)
  Gastric cancer 4 (5.9) 3 (7.1) 8 (7.4)
  Other 6 (8.8) 6 (14.3) 19 (17.6)
Prior antitumour chemotherapy, n (%)
  Any 68 (100) 42 (100) 108 (100)
  Oxaliplatin 57 (83.8) 34 (81.0) 81 (75.0)
  Capecitabine 48 (70.6) 31 (73.8) 73 (67.6)
  Fluorouracil 37 (54.4) 27 (64.3) 54 (50.0)
  Irinotecan 34 (50.0) 31 (73.8) 52 (48.1)
  Docetaxel 7 (10.3) 6 (14.3) 11 (10.2)
Other prior antitumour systemic therapy, n (%)
  Any 41 (60.3) 28 (66.7) 65 (60.2)
  Bevacizumab 28 (41.2) 20 (47.6) 43 (39.8)
  Cetuximab 7 (10.3) 7 (16.7) 12 (11.1)
PD-L1a
  Positive 30 (44.1) 17 (40.5) 43 (39.8)
  Negative 29 (42.6) 21 (50.0) 54 (50.0)
  Missing 9 (13.2) 4 (9.5) 11 (10.2)
Tumour mutational burdenb
  High 55 (80.9) 30 (71.4) 57 (52.8)
  Low 8 (11.8) 7 (16.7) 41 (38.0)
  Missing 5 (7.4) 5 (11.9) 10 (9.3)

PD-L1 programmed death-ligand 1.

aPositive PD-L1 status was defined as a combined positive score ≥1.

bTumour mutational burden (TMB) high was defined as a score ≥10.