Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 6;15:7. doi: 10.1007/s40820-022-00963-w

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The schematic diagram and RL values of a, e T180, b, f T190, c, g T200, and d, h T210. Comparison of the i RL and j EAB of different samples. k Radar chart for comparison of EAB, QBW, RLmin, thickness (abbreviated as Thr.), density, and fabrication precision in the optimized T210 and the other reported gradient distributions/layers structures. Frequency is abbreviated as Fre