Table 1.
Selected results from fixed-effects linear probability models: The relationship between family policy orientations and first and second conceptions
| First conception | Second conception | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coeff | St.error | Coeff | St.error | |
| Social invesment-oriented support | 0.00003 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.00 |
| Passive family support | − 0.00005 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00 |
| Rho | 0.00089 | 0.00200 | ||
| Numaber of Countries | 20 | 20 | ||
| Number of Observation | 2,409,430 | 1,279,650 | ||
| AIC | − 5,560,143 | − 2,573,641 | ||
| BIC | − 5,559,636 | − 2,573,182 | ||
Note: results are adjusted for educational level and year fixed effects in both models. In the first conception model, estimates are also adjusted for age and the non-proportionality of the educational level association over age groups. In the second conception model, estimates are also adjusted for age of the youngest child, age at first birth and the non-proportionality of the educational level association over age at first birth. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001