Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 6;12:152. doi: 10.1186/s13568-022-01494-8

Table 2.

Chicory samples #1, #2 and #3 treated with individual enzymes or mixtures (5 mg/g protein) were assessed for antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa

Sample Enzyme treatment Release of hydrolysis products as reducing sugarsa Antimicrobial activity
(mg/mL) (% of dry matter) S. aureus E 70045 P. aeruginosa E-84219
#1 Pectinase + xylanase 15.9 31.7  +  +  +  (+ + +)b
Pectinase + xylanase +  β-glucosidase 21.3 42.6  +  +  +  (+ + +)b
Pectinase + xylanase +  β-glucosidase + inulinase 19.6 39.3  +  +  +  (+ + +)b
No enzyme  +  + 
#2 Pectinase + xylanase 9.3 18.6  +  + 
Pectinase + xylanase +  β-glucosidase 30.7 61.5  +  +  + 
Pectinase + xylanase +  β-glucosidase + inulinase 34.5 69.7  +  +  + 
No enzyme  +  + 
#3 Pectinase + xylanase 26.0 52.0  +  +  +   +  +  +  + 
No enzyme  + 

No inhibitory effect was observed with enzyme preparations in the absence of chicory extract. − no inhibitory effect; + weak inhibition; +  + moderate inhibition; +  +  + strong inhibition; +  +  +  + very strong inhibition

aResults were corrected by subtracting readings from the sample without treatment and the sample with enzyme only

bGrowth inhibition at 24 h, complete growth recovery at 48 h