Table 3.
Bivariate and adjusted associations between neighborhood crime and sleep among young sexual minority men
| Variable | Risk ratio, bivariate model | P-value | Risk ratio, adjusted model | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Violent crime count, 50-m activity area buffer | 0.9999 | 0.16 | 0.9999 | 0.06 |
| Violent crime count, 400-m residential area buffer | 0.9999 | 0.77 | 0.9998 | 0.73 |
| Violent crime count, zip code | 0.9999 | 0.651 | 1.8652 | 0.40 |
| Violent crime count, census tract | 1.0001 | 0.894 | 0.9999 | 0.30 |
| Perceived neighborhood safety, daytime | ||||
| Very safe | Referent | Referent | Referent | Referent |
| Somewhat safe | 0.9882 | 0.95 | 1.0201 | 0.92 |
| Unsafe | 1.9764 | 0.23 | 1.6530 | 0.47 |
| Perceived neighborhood safety, nighttime | ||||
| Very safe | Referent | Referent | Referent | Referent |
| Somewhat safe | 1.3739 | 0.05 | 1.5347 | 0.02 |
| Unsafe | 0.9096 | 0.75 | 0.9384 | 0.86 |
| Witnessed crime, number of types | 1.1770 | < 0.01 | 1.174 | < 0.01 |
| Witnessed crime, dichotomous | 1.4685 | 0.015 | 1.463 | 0.039 |
Adjusted model controls for individual-level age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, current school status, birthplace, residential preference, income, self-identified sexuality, relationship status, housing situation, zip code percent living below poverty, zip code percent Black, and zip code percent Hispanic