Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 6;12:21100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25186-2

Table 2.

The incidences of recurrent biliary obstruction and its causes.

HFS (n = 36) WPS (n = 20) WFS (n = 26)a p-value
Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO)
Total 8 (22.2) 10 (50.0) 13 (50.0)

0.033 (HFS vs. WPS)

0.023 (HFS vs. WFS)

Sludge accumulation 1 (2.8) 6 (30.0) 3 (11.5)

0.003 (HFS vs. WPS)

0.166 (HFS vs. WFS)

Food impaction 2 (5.6) 0 (0) 2 (7.7) 0.471
Hemobilia 0 (0) 1 (5.0) 0 (0) 0.208
Tumor overgrowth 2 (5.6) 0 (0) 3 (11.5) 0.264
Tumor ingrowth /mucosal hyperplasia 0 (0) 2 (10.0) 0 (0) 0.053 (HFS vs. WPS)
Stent migration 3 (8.3) 1 (5.0) 5 (19.2) 0.246
Removal of SEMS 8 (22.2) 2 (10.0) 7 (25.0) 0.411

Data are presented as median (range) or number (proportion).

SEMS Self-expandable metal stent, HFS HILZO fully covered stent, WPS WALLFLEX biliary RX partially covered stent, WFS WALLFLEX biliary RX fully covered stent.

aTwo patients in which SEMS was removed due to complications other than RBO were excluded.