Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 23;12:895177. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.895177

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients in the training and validation cohorts.

Characteristic Training cohort n = 62 Validation cohort n = 31 p-value a
Patients, No. (%)
Age, mean (SD), year 49.4 (11.2) 52.9 (8.6) .21
Platinum sensitivity, No. (%) .93
 Resistant 12 (20) 7 (23)
 Sensitive 50 (80) 24 (77)
HIPEC, No. (%) >.99
 ≥1 cycle 24 (39) 12 (39)
 Non 38 (61) 19 (61)
FIGO stage b , No. (%) .73
 I 13 (21) 8 (26)
 II 4 (6) 3 (10)
 III 37 (60) 18 (58)
 IV 8 (13) 2 (6)
Histologic classification, No. (%) .32
 Serous carcinoma 39 (63) 20 (65)
 Endometrioid carcinoma 9 (15) 1 (3)
 Clear cell carcinoma 5 (8) 6 (19)
 Mucinous carcinoma 2 (3) 1 (3)
 Special types 7 (11) 3 (10)
Type of surgery, No. (%) >.99
 PDS 54 (87) 27 (87)
 IDS 8 (13) 4 (13)
Follow-up time, months (median [IQR]) 21.0 [13.7, 33.2] 23.2 [15.2, 43.3] .44

FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; SD, standard deviation; HIPEC, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; PDS, primary debulking surgery; IDS, interval debulking surgery; IQR, interquartile range.

a

p-values represent the difference of each clinicopathologic variable between the training and validation cohorts.

b

2018 FIGO staging.