TABLE 1.
Segmentation performance of deep learning methods on ICH dataset.
| Method | Parameters (1 × 106) | ICH lesions (95% CI) | IPH (95% CI) | IVH (95% CI) | EDH (95% CI) | SDH (95% CI) | SAH (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-Net | 2.47 | 0.624 (0.587, 0.661) | 0.688 (0.638, 0.738) | 0.518 (0.457, 0.580) | 0.222 (0.083, 0.361) | 0.321 (0.239, 0.404) | 0.245 (0.206, 0.284) |
| DU-Net | 4.83 | 0.611 (0.573, 0.649) | 0.674 (0.622, 0.725) | 0.496 (0.432, 0.560) | 0.119 (0.014, 0.224) | 0.256 (0.171, 0.341) | 0.226 (0.186, 0.265) |
| SEU-Net | 2.47 | 0.629 (0.592, 0.666) | 0.691 (0.642, 0.741) | 0.538 (0.478, 0.598) | 0.253 (0.101, 0.405) | 0.381 (0.304, 0.459) | 0.256 (0.216, 0.295) |
| DA-Net | 26.97 | 0.669 (0.636, 0.702) | 0.739 (0.695, 0.782) | 0.605 (0.550, 0.660) | 0.244 (0.112, 0.375) | 0.434 (0.348, 0.520) | 0.269 (0.227, 0.311) |
| HR-Net | 17.12 | 0.686 (0.656, 0.717) | 0.758 (0.715, 0.802) | 0.654 (0.603, 0.706) | 0.205 (0.046, 0.364) | 0.531 (0.458, 0.606) | 0.317 (0.306, 0.389) |
| Ours | 43.06 | 0.716 (0.685, 0.747) | 0.784 (0.745, 0.824) | 0.680 (0.631, 0.730) | 0.359 (0.173, 0.545) | 0.534 (0.455, 0.613) | 0.337 (0.293,0.382) |