Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 23;13:956907. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.956907

Table 3.

Estimated change from baseline to each follow-up time point in patients in the 50 μg dose.

(T1) to T2 (T1) to T3 (T1) to T4
CD4 FoxP3+ 0.16; p=0.61 -0.01; p=0.98 0.16; p=0.63
CD8+nv 8.07; p=0.003 6.75; p=0.01 5.69; p=0.03
CD8+GzmB+ -5.43; p=0.02 -4.85; p=0.03 -5.17; p=0.03
CD8+Tem -2.71; p=0.004 -2.13; p=0.01 -1.27; p=0.14
CD8+TEMRA -4.01; p=0.04 -3.8; p=0.06 -4.4; p=0.04
CD8+Prf+ -1.22; p=0.08 -1.5; p=0.04 -1.38; p=0.07
CD8+Tcm -1.44; p=0.20 -1.22; p=0.27 -0.6; p=0.61
CD4+nv 6.01; p=0.04 6.49; p=0.03 2.28; p=0.42
CD4+Tem -3.1; p=0.07 -3.29; p=0.05 -0.66; p=0.70
CD4+TEMRA -2.24; p=0.05 -2.26; p=0.05 -1.81; p=0.13
CD4+GzmB+ -2.05; p=0.06 -2.25; p=0.04 -1.57; p=0.17
CD4+Tcm -0.91; p=0.51 -0.84; p=0.54 0.03; p=0.98

The estimated difference and p-value were calculated using a mixed effects model with a random intercept. Positive estimated differences indicate that the mean level of the marker increased after administration of the treatment. Bold entries had a p-value less than 0.05.