TABLE 3.
Ordinary one-way or two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with their respective post hoc comparison for each figure.
| Fig | Test | Post hoc comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Ordinary one-way ANOVA | Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test |
| 2A | Tx: F(3, 16) = 19.82; p < 0.001 | C vs. Cloni[0.1], p < 0.001; C vs. Cloni[1], p < 0.001; C vs. Cloni[10], p < 0.001 |
| 2C | Tx: F(3, 16) = 21.35; p < 0.001 | C vs. Cloni[0.1], p < 0.001; C vs. Cloni[1], p < 0.001; C vs. Cloni[10], p < 0.001 |
| 3 | Ordinary one-way ANOVA | Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test |
| 3B | Tx: F(5, 24) = 20.09; p < 0.001 | C vs. V + Cloni, p < 0.001; C vs. BRL[0.1]+Cloni, p < 0.001; C vs. BRL[1]+Cloni, p = 0.006; C vs. Imi[10]+Cloni, p < 0.001; C vs. JP[1]+Cloni, p < 0.001 |
| 3C | Tx: F(5, 24) = 12.4; p < 0.001 | C vs. V + Cloni, p < 0.001; C vs. BRL[0.1]+Cloni, p < 0.003; C vs. BRL[1]+Cloni, p = 0.402; C vs. Imi[10]+Cloni, p = 0.001; C vs. JP[1]+Cloni, p < 0.001 |
| 3E | Tx: F(4, 20) = 4.83; p = 0.007 | C vs. BRL[0.1], p = 0.211; C vs. BRL[1], p = 0.205; C vs. Imi[10], p = 0.869; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.009 |
| 3F | Tx: F(4, 20) = 3.38; p = 0.029 | C vs. BRL[0.1], p = 0.831; C vs. BRL[1], p = 0.328; C vs. Imi[10], p = 0.932; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.046 |
| 6 | ||
| 6B | Two-way RM ANOVA | Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test |
| Interaction: F(24, 120) = 0.85;p = 0.664 | Basal: C vs. V, p = 0.061; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.061; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.055; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.093 min 10: C vs. V, p = 0.132; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.035; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.096; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.096 | |
| Time: F(2.53, 50.57) = 2.79; p = 0.059 | min 20: C vs. V, p = 0.512; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.271; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.271; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.422 | |
| Tx: F(4, 20) = 2.23; p = 0.1023 | min 30: C vs. V, p = 0.797; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.302; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.721; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.721 | |
| min 40: C vs. V, p = 0.893; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.359; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.595; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.673 | ||
| min 50: C vs. V, p = 0.626; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.201; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.604; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.626 | ||
| min 60: C vs. V, p = 0.947; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.829; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.829; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.837 | ||
| 6C | Two-way RM ANOVA | Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test |
| Interaction: F(24, 120) = 2.35;p = 0.001 | Basal: C vs. V, p = 0.282; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.122; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.547; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.074 min 10: C vs. V, p = 0.593; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.431; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.289; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.445 min 20: C vs. V, p = 0.766; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.042; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.022; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.058 | |
| Time: F(3.698, 73.96) = 5.25; p = 0.001 | min 30: C vs. V, p = 0.223; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.033; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.005; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.096 | |
| Tx: F(4, 20) = 12.39; p < 0.001 | min 40: C vs. V, p = 0.525; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.021; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.002; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.153 | |
| min 50: C vs. V, p = 0.412; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.006; C vs. Cloni[10], p < 0.001; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.032 | ||
| min 60: C vs. V, p = 0.872; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.012; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.012; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.872 | ||
| 6D | Two-way RM ANOVA | Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test |
| Interaction: F(24, 120) = 2.79; p < 0.001 | Basal: C vs. V, p = 0.866; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.866; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.866; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.866 min 10: C vs. V, p = 0.287; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.056; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.033; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.287 | |
| Time: F(3.3, 66.0) = 3.52; p = 0.017 | min 20: C vs. V, p = 0.079; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.165; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.011; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.165 | |
| Tx: F(4, 20) = 6.29; p < 0.002 | min 30: C vs. V, p = 0.153; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.153; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.010; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.107 | |
| min 40: C vs. V, p = 0.037; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.126; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.018; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.008 | ||
| min 50: C vs. V, p = 0.462; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.462; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.003; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.046 | ||
| min 60: C vs. V, p = 0.991; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.861; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.047; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.879 | ||
| 6E | Two-way RM ANOVA | Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test |
| Interaction: F(24, 104) = 1.72; p = 0.03 | Basal: C vs. V, p = 0.922; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.922; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.922; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.851 min 10: C vs. V, p = 0.906; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.388; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.102; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.962 | |
| Time: F(4.038, 70.0) = 0.59; p = 0.67 | min 20: C vs. V, p = 0.933; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.933; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.059; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.933 | |
| Tx: F(4, 20) = 4.62; p < 0.008 | min 30: C vs. V, p = 0.819; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.819; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.019; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.619 | |
| min 40: C vs. V, p = 0.995; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.995; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.004; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.995 | ||
| min 50: C vs. V, p = 0.875; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.763; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.096; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.763 | ||
| min 60: C vs. V, p = 0.966; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.966; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.148; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.963 | ||
| 6F | Ordinary one-way ANOVA | |
| Tx: F(4, 20) = 1.385; p = 0.275 | ||
| 6G | Ordinary one-way ANOVA | Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test |
| Tx: F(4, 20) = 12.974; p < 0.001 | C vs. V, p = 0.4; C vs. Cloni[1], p < 0.001; C vs. Cloni[10], p < 0.001; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.1 | |
| 6H | Ordinary one-way ANOVA | Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test |
| Tx: F(4, 20) = 6.413; p = 0.002 | C vs. V, p = 0.2; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.2; C vs. Cloni[10], p < 0.001; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.9 | |
| 6I | Ordinary one-way ANOVA | Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test |
| Tx: F(4, 20) = 4.169; p = 0.013 | C vs. V, p = 0.9; C vs. Cloni[1], p = 0.9; C vs. Cloni[10], p = 0.018; C vs. Cloni[10]+BRL, p = 0.8 | |
| 7 | ||
| 7C | Two-way RM ANOVA | Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test |
| Interaction: F(18, 96) = 1.49; p = 0.109 | Basal: C vs. V, p = 0.061; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.099; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.099 min 10: C vs. V, p = 0.246; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.246; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.620 | |
| Time: F(2.8, 44.76) = 2.35; p = 0.089 | min 20: C vs. V, p = 0.526; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.526; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.526 | |
| Tx: F(3, 16) = 0.782; p = 0.522 | min 30: C vs. V, p = 0.941; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.744; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.941 | |
| min 40: C vs. V, p = 0.981; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.907; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.981 | ||
| min 50: C vs. V, p = 0.735; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.735; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.735 | ||
| min 60: C vs. V, p = 0.947; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.615; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.799 | ||
| 7D | Two-way RM ANOVA | Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test |
| Interaction: F(18, 96) = 1.63; p = 0.67 | Basal: C vs. V, p = 0.213; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.213; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.136 min 10: C vs. V, p = 0.645; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.645; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.243 | |
| Time: F(3.39, 54.27) = 0.99; p = 0.409 | min 20: C vs. V, p = 0.766; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.255; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.199 | |
| Tx: F(3, 16) = 2.351; p = 0.111 | min 30: C vs. V, p = 0.443; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.443; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.443 | |
| min 40: C vs. V, p = 0.665; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.223; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.665 | ||
| min 50: C vs. V, p = 0.411; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.117; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.055 | ||
| min 60: C vs. V, p = 0.739; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.143; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.739 | ||
| 7E | Two-way RM ANOVA | Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test |
| Interaction: F(18, 96) = 1.60; p = 0.074 | Basal: C vs. V, p = 0.774; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.774; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.349 min 10: C vs. V, p = 0.287; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.448; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.201 | |
| Time: F(2.37, 37.95) = 0.415; p = 0.697 | min 20: C vs. V, p = 0.079; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.233; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.084 | |
| Tx: F(3, 16) = 0.829; p = 0.497 | min 30: C vs. V, p = 0.221; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.287; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.287 | |
| min 40: C vs. V, p = 0.055; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.338; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.338 | ||
| min 50: C vs. V, p = 0.462; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.464; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.464 | ||
| min 60: C vs. V, p = 0.991; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.922; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.990 | ||
| 7F | Two-way RM ANOVA | Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison test |
| Interaction: F(18, 91) = 2.31; p = 0.005 | Basal: C vs. V, p = 0.922; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.946; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.922 min 10: C vs. V, p = 0.972; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.972; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.972 | |
| Time: F(2.011, 30.5) = 1.31; p = 0.286 | min 20: C vs. V, p = 0.840; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.840; C vs. JP[10], p = 0. 840 | |
| Tx: F(3, 16) = 0.916; p = 0.456 | min 30: C vs. V, p = 0.666; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.652; C vs. JP[10], p = 0. 652 | |
| min 40: C vs. V, p = 0.824; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.404; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.506 | ||
| min 50: C vs. V, p = 0.733; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.743; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.733 | ||
| min 60: C vs. V, p = 0.595; C vs. JP[1], p = 0.595; C vs. JP[10], p = 0.421 | ||
| 7G | Ordinary one-way ANOVA | Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test |
| Tx: F(3, 16) = 4.308; p = 0.021 | C vs. JP, p = 0.013; C vs. JP + Bicu[0.3], p = 0.218; C vs. Bicu[0.3], p = 0.181 | |
| 7H | Ordinary one-way ANOVA | Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test |
| Tx: F(4, 20) = 6.413; p = 0.002 | C vs. JP, p = 0.047; C vs. JP + Bicu[0.3], p = 0.638; C vs. Bicu[0.3], p = 0.9 |
Abbreviations: Control (C); Clonidine (Cloni); BRL 44408 (BRL); Imiloxan (Imi); JP 1302 (JP); Bicuculline (Bicu).