Table 1.
Shows Comparison of MLP and SVM Algorithm
| Column1 | MlP (two hidden layers) | SVM |
|---|---|---|
| The percentage split 75% | The percentage split 75% | |
| Correlation coefficient | 0.5669 | 0.6342 |
| Mean absolute error | 13.2958 | 11.6237 |
| Root mean squared error | 17.9234 | 17.1052 |
| Relative absolute error | 77.36% | 67.63% |
| Root relative squared error | 84.88% | 81.00% |
| Total Number of Instances | 359 | 359 |
| Percentage split 85% | Percentage split 85% | |
| Correlation coefficient | 0.6133 | 0.6402 |
| Mean absolute error | 14.372 | 11.2879 |
| Root mean squared error | 18.9334 | 17.0521 |
| Relative absolute error | 83.60% | 65.66% |
| Root relative squared error | 89.16% | 80.30% |
| Total Number of Instances | 216 | 216 |
| Cross-validation (10 fold) | ||
| Correlation coefficient | 0.5995 | 0.6419 |
| Mean absolute error | 12.7017 | 11.2861 |
| Root mean squared error | 17.1316 | 16.4005 |
| Relative absolute error | 75.31% | 66.92% |
| Root relative squared error | 83.20% | 79.65% |
| Total Number of Instances | 1438 | 1438 |
| Cross-validation (15fold) | ||
| Correlation coefficient | 0.61 | 0.6415 |
| Mean absolute error | 12.4953 | 11.2775 |
| Root mean squared error | 16.8053 | 16.4056 |
| Relative absolute error | 74.10% | 66.88% |
| Root relative squared error | 81.62% | 79.68% |
| Total Number of Instances | 1438 | 1438 |