Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul;23(7):2449–2457. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.7.2449

Table 1.

Data from Studies Regarding the Association of Pretherapeutic ADC Values with OS of PCNSL Patients

Study (Year) Regio Study Design Patients Methods of ADC used ADC Cut-off values used (10-6 mm2/s) OS (Low ADC group vs
high ADC group)
Hazard Ratio (HR) 95%CI p-value
Barajas et al. (2010) United States Cohort 18 ADC25% 692 Mean OS 15.8 months vs 30.9 months; p = <0.01 0.12 (multivariate analysis) 0.02 - 0.71 0.02
ADCmin 384 0.01 (multivariate analysis) 0.00 – 0.33 0.01
Valles et al. (2013) United States Cohort 25 ADCmin 384 Mean OS 12.1 months vs 20.1 months; p = 0.05 0.29 (multivariate analysis) 0.102 - 0.824 0.02
Dong Wo Baek et al. (2020) South Korea Cohort 52 Reference to Barajas et al.10 Reference to
Barajas et al.10
OS at 3 year was shorter, (56.0±3.7% vs 76.5%±8.6%);
p = 0.05
0.392 (multivariate analysis) 0.155 - 0.854 0.12