Skip to main content
. 2022 Winter;21(4):ar73. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-03-0056

TABLE 5.

Agreement with different myths using a Likert scale (mean ± SD)a

Item (myths) Pretest Posttest Main effect for teaching intervention (pretest vs. posttest)
EG (mean ± SD) CG (mean ± SD) EG (mean ± SD) CG (mean ± SD) F test ηp²
M1: You can’t see a bed bug. (wrong) 2.94 ± 1.42 2.96 ± 1.45 1.53 ± 1.12 2.01 ± 1.32 F(1, 192) = 92.51***,b 0.33
M2: Bed bugs live in dirty places. (wrong) 3.15 ± 1.18 3.19 ± 1.25 1.42 ± 0.99 1.37 ± 0.89 F(1, 193) = 306.36*** 0.61
M3: Bed bugs transmit diseases. (wrong) 3.23 ± 1.09 3.27 ± 1.08 1.45 ± 0.82 1.74 ± 1.12 F(1, 193) = 257.68*** 0.57
M4: Bed bugs won’t come out if the room is brightly lit. (wrong) 2.71 ± 1.03 2.70 ± 1.04 2.52 ± 1.44 2.41 ± 1.32 F(1, 193) = 4.45* 0.02
M5: Pesticide applications alone will easily eliminate bed bug infestations. (wrong) 3.09 ± 0.97 2.93 ± 0.94 2.88 ± 1.35 2.64 ± 1.42 F(1, 191) = 4.41* 0.02

a1 = low agreement to 5 = high agreement (theoretical scale mean: 2.5; values above 2.5 indicate agreement). F values refer to a main effect for teaching intervention (pretest vs. posttest) calculated through rmANOVA; no interaction effects of teaching intervention × treatment (live bed bugs vs. picture) were found except for myth M1. The levels of significance refer to the F test from repeated-measures analysis of variance (rmANOVA): nsp > 0.05; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; effect size partial eta-square (ηp²). EG, experimental group (live bed bug); CG, control group (picture).

bThere was a marginally significant interaction effect of teaching intervention × treatment, F(1, 192) = 3.62, p = 0.059. That is, in the experimental group (live bed bug), there was significantly more agreement with this statement in the posttest compared with the pretest than in the control group (picture).