The comparison of PV parameters of Cs2BiAgI6 and similar absorbers-based solar cells.
| Typea | Device structure | V OC (V) | J SC (mA cm−2) | FF (%) | PCE (%) | Year | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | FTO/c-TiO2/mTiO2/Cs2AgBiBr6/N719/spiro-OMeTAD/Ag | 1.06 | 5.13 | — | 2.84 | 2020 | 92 |
| E | FTO/TiO2/Cs2AgBiBr6/spiro-OMeTAD/Au | 0.98 | 3.96 | 62.40 | 2.43 | 2021 | 91 |
| T | FTO/PCBM/Cs2BiAgI6/PTAA/Au | 1.08 | 19.94 | 74.87 | 16.23 | 2021 | 72 |
| T | Ohmic contact/spiro-OMeTAD/Cs2BiAgI6/TiO2/SnO2:F(ZnO2)/ohmic contact | 1.18 | 16.2 | 80.20 | 15.90 | 2018 | 93 |
| T | Glass/FTO/TiO2/Cs2AgBiBr6/Cu2O/Au | 1.5 | 11.45 | 42.10 | 7.25 | 2020 | 90 |
| T | ZnO-NR/Cs2AgBiBr6/P3HT(base) | 0.91 | 11.10 | 44.02 | 4.48 | 2021 | 40 |
| T | ITO/PCBM/Cs2BiAgI6/CBTS/Au | 1.08 | 22.39 | 82.56 | 19.99 | — | b |
| T | ITO/TiO2/Cs2BiAgI6/CBTS/Au | 1.08 | 23.8 | 83.61 | 21.55 | — | b |
| T | ITO/ZnO/Cs2BiAgI6/CBTS/Au | 1.08 | 23.76 | 83.78 | 21.59 | — | b |
| T | ITO/C60/Cs2BiAgI6/CBTS/Au | 1.07 | 19.62 | 82.65 | 17.47 | — | b |
| T | ITO/IGZO/Cs2BiAgI6/CBTS/Au | 1.09 | 23.65 | 79.04 | 20.42 | — | b |
| T | ITO/SnO2/Cs2BiAgI6/CBTS/Au | 1.08 | 23.76 | 83.54 | 21.52 | — | b |
| T | ITO/CeO2/Cs2BiAgI6/CBTS/Au | 0.92 | 23.59 | 66.21 | 14.44 | — | b |
| T | ITO/WS2/Cs2BiAgI6/CBTS/Au | 1.08 | 23.53 | 83.91 | 21.43 | — | b |
a
E = experimental, T = theoretical.
b
This work.