Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Commun Disord. 2022 Oct 29;100:106274. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106274

Table 3.

Wilcoxon signed rank test item-level differences on the CASES-M in high and low active listening conditions for n = 51 parents of children who stutter.

High frequencyactive listening Low frequencyactive listening
CASES-M Item Median Mean SD Median Mean SD p-value Effect Size r
1. The clinician attended (oriented herself physically toward the caregiver). 4 3.75 1.28 3 3.33 1.45 0.083 0.243 (small)
2. The clinician listened (captured and understood the message that the caregiver communicated). 4 3.75 1.27 3 3.20 1.30 0.021 0.323 (medium)
3. The clinician restated (repeated or rephrased what the caregiver said in a way that was succinct, concrete, and clear). 4 3.71 1.30 1 1.27 0.83 <0.000* 0.792 (large)
4. The clinician asked open questions (questions to help the caregiver clarify or explore their thoughts and feelings). 3 2.71 1.62 1 1.84 1.38 0.001* 0.453 (medium)
5. The clinician reflected feelings (repeated or rephrased the caregivers’ statements with an emphasis on their feelings). 3 2.96 1.51 1 1.24 0.76 <0.000* 0.682 (large)
6. The clinician revealed personal information about their history, credentials, or feelings. 1 1.14 0.72 1 1.10 0.46 0.832 0.029
7. The clinician used silence (to allow the caregiver to get in touch with thoughts and feelings). 4 3.67 1.31 3 3.06 1.53 0.001* .466 (medium)
8. The clinician pointed out discrepancies in the caregiver’s response. 1 1.10 0.67 1 1.04 0.49 0.793 0.037
9. The clinician made interpretations (statements beyond what the caregiver overtly stated to give the caregiver a new way of looking at thoughts and feelings). 1 1.80 1.23 1 1.06 0.58 0.001* 0.453 (medium)
10. The clinician disclosed past experiences in which they had gained insight. 1 1.12 0.62 1 1.08 0.52 0.793 0.037
11. The clinician disclosed immediate feelings about the client, the therapeutic relationship, or themselves in relation to the caregiver. 1 1.14 0.69 1 1.10 0.50 .944 .010
12. The clinician gave information (taught or provided the caregiver with data, opinions, facts, resources, or answers to questions). 1 1.18 0.68 1 1.12 0.52 0.590 0.075
13. The clinician gave direct guidance (suggestions, directives, or advice that imply actions for the caregiver to take). 1 2.12 0.68 1 1.08 0.48 0.784 0.038
CASES-M Scale 2.23 2.24 0.66 1.62 1.65 0.51
*

Indicates significance at the Bonferroni-adjusted p-value .05/13 = 0.004.

Note. The CASES-M was adapted from Victorino and Hinkle (2018) with permission from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association. Effect sizes were interpreted according to Cohen’s r (Cohen, 1988; Pallant, 2011).