Table VI.
Leader perspectives about potential implementation facilitators
| Themes/ subthemes | Facility 1 (n=11) | Facility 2 (n=11) | Facility 3 (n=10) | Facility 4 (n=16) | Facility 5 (n=11) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority safety, health, and well-being issues | Workload – burnout, stress | X | X | X | X | X |
| Patient violence | X | X | X | |||
| Security – visitors, physical building | X | X | X | |||
| Patient handling (back injuries) | X | X | X | |||
| Slips, trips, and falls | X | X | ||||
| Strengths of the facility’s safety and health or Environment of Care committee | Leaders are engaged/committed | X | X | X | X | |
| Leaders are knowledgeable | X | X | X | |||
| Multidisciplinary team | X | X | ||||
| Good collaboration and support | X | X | ||||
| Continuous meetings and inspections | X | X | ||||
| Timely reporting of industrial accidents | X | |||||
| Alignment between the study goals and facility’s mission | Agreement among most interviewees | X | X | X | X | X |
| Desired study outcomes for the organization | Identify areas in need of improvement | X | X | X | X | X |
| Improve communication | X | X | X | X | ||
| Implement effective/practical solutions | X | X | X | |||
| Engage front-line workers in safety | X | X | X | |||