Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 6;11:153. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01189-6

Table 2.

Summary of mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) methodological quality assessment

Quantitative descriptive studies Approach MMAT criteria for quantitative descriptive studies
Is the sampling strategy relevant to address the research question? Is the sample representative of the target population? Are the measurements appropriate? Is the risk of nonresponse bias low? Is the statistical analysis appropriate to answer the research question?
Akbar et al. [29] Survey Y Y Y N Y
Ashiru-Oredope et al. [33] Survey Y Y Y Y Y
Barchitta et al. [34] Survey Y Y Y Y Y
Bouchoucha et al. [25] Survey Y Y Y U Y
Carter et al. [21] Survey Y U Y N Y
Hamilton et al. [22] Survey Y U Y N Y
Herawati et al. [30] Survey Y U Y N Y
Lim et al. [31] Survey Y U Y N Y
Monsees et al. [23] Survey Y U Y U Y
Padigos et al. [26] Survey Y U Y U Y
Qualitative studies Approach MMAT criteria for qualitative studies
IIs the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? Are the findings adequately derived from the data? Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation?
Dowson et al. [27] Interview Y Y Y Y Y
Kirby et al. [28] Interview Y Y Y Y Y
Rout et al. [35] Interview Y Y Y Y Y
Van Gulik et al. [32] Focus group Y Y Y Y Y
Mixed-methods studies Approach MMAT criteria for mixed-methods studies
Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question? Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question? Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted? Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed? Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved?
Knobloch et al. [24] Interviews, prescribing data analysis Y Y Y Y Y
Mula et al. [36] Multiple data source including focus groups, interviews, participants observations Y Y Y Y Y

Y yes, addressed, N no, not satisfied, U unknown, cannot be determined