Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 23;30(7):1027–1036. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2002.02056

Fig. 2. Correspondence analysis (CA) of the fungal community composition associated with S. purpurea.

Fig. 2

Two different clusters of samples are clearly shown in the CA diagram. Results for roots are clustered at the upper left (x, -0.521; y, 0.203) and results for leaves are at the upper right (x, 1.847; y, 0.722). Axes are correspondence components, DIM 1 and DIM2, with score and loading values. 1, Alternaria carthami; 2, Ascomycota sp. ; 3, Cadophora sp.; 4, Chaetomium murorum; 5, Darksidea delta; 6, Fusarium acuminatum; 7, Fusarium pseudograminearum; 8, Fusarium sp.1; 9, Fusarium sp.2; 10, Fusarium tricinctum; 11, Gloeotinia sp.; 12, Helotiales sp.; 13, Heydenia alpina; 14, Heydenia arietina; 15, Heydenia myrsines; 16, Microdochium bolleyi; 17, Monosporascus ibericus; 18, Myrothecium inundatum; 19, Paraphoma sp.; 20, Phialophora mustea; 21, Pleosporales sp.; 22, Pyricularia ctenantheicola; 23, Saccharicola bicolor; 24, Scytalidium sp.; 25, Simplicillium chinense; 26, Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus; 27, Stachybotrys bisbyi; 28, Stagonospora perfecta; 29, Thielavia hyalocarpa; 30, Trichoderma citrinum; 31, Trichoderma sp. ; 32, Verticillium leptobactrum; 33, Verticillium sp.