. 2020 May 31;30(9):1321–1334. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2003.03021

Table 3.

Relative abundance of major genera in different types of dietary protein media.

Taxon	Beef	Pork	Chicken	Milk	B_Feces	A_Feces	p value
Meat (Beef, Pork, and Chicken)
g__Rummeliibacillus	19.15 ± 5.07^b	22.09 ± 4^b	8.3 ± 2.84^a	0.55 ± 0.36^a	3.7 ± 0.72^a	3.22 ± 1.55^a	<0.001^***
g__Clostridium	6.4 ± 2.18^b	5.06 ± 1.76^b	4.22 ± 0.78^b	0.1 ± 0.03^a	0.1 ± 0.01^a	0.13 ± 0.04^a	<0.001^***
g__Phascolarctobacterium	3.35 ± 1.19^b	4.81 ± 0.56^bc	6.27 ± 1.9^c	0.13 ± 0.07^a	0.55 ± 0.16^a	0.54 ± 0.31^a	<0.001^***
g__Peptostreptococcus	1.69 ± 2.00	2.2 ± 2.03	2.88 ± 1.47	0.01 ± 0.01	0.07 ± 0.08	0.02 ± 0.02	0.063
g__Veillonella	0.07 ± 0.03^a	0.28 ± 0.10^a	1.46 ± 0.96^b	0 ± 0^a	0.02 ± 0.00^a	0.05 ± 0.02^a	0.004^**
g__Erwinia	0.26 ± 0.07^b	0.26 ± 0.07^b	0.31 ± 0.03^b	0.13 ± 0^a	0.01 ± 0.01^a	0.04 ± 0^a	<0.001^***
g__Bacillus	0.22 ± 0.06^bc	0.28 ± 0.04^c	0.11 ± 0.04^ab	0.01 ± 0^a	0.19 ± 0.12^bc	0.02 ± 0^a	<0.001^***
g__Serratia	0.12 ± 0.01^c	0.12 ± 0.02^c	0.14 ± 0.01^c	0.12 ± 0.01^c	0.01 ± 0.01^a	0.06 ± 0.02^b	<0.001^***
g__Blautia	0.13 ± 0.02^c	0.1 ± 0.01^bc	0.08 ± 0.01^b	0.02 ± 0.01^a	0.07 ± 0.02^b	0.07 ± 0.01^b	<0.001^***
g__[Eubacterium]	0.11 ± 0.03^b	0.11 ± 0.03^b	0.07 ± 0.02^ab	0.03 ± 0.01^a	0.07 ± 0.01^ab	0.09 ± 0.03^ab	0.009^**
g__Solibacillus	0.09 ± 0.03^bc	0.13 ± 0.02^c	0.05 ± 0.01^ab	0 ± 0^a	0.07 ± 0.02^b	0.03 ± 0^a	<0.001^***
g__Sphingomonas	0.11 ± 0.06^b	0.03 ± 0.05^a	0 ± 0^a	0 ± 0^a	0 ± 0^a	0 ± 0^a	0.004^**
g__Pseudoramibacter_	0.04 ± 0.02^ab	0.05 ± 0.03^b	0.04 ± 0.02^ab	0 ± 0^a	0 ± 0.01^ab	0.01 ± 0^ab	0.016^*
Eubacterium
g_Enterobacter	0.03 ± 0^b	0.04 ± 0.01^b	0.04 ± 0.01^b	0.04 ± 0^b	0 ± 0^a	0.01 ± 0^a	<0.001^***
g__Pantoea	0.01 ± 0.01^b	0.01 ± 0^b	0.01 ± 0.01^ab	0.01 ± 0^b	0 ± 0^a	0 ± 0^ab	0.006^**
g__Kurthia	0.01 ± 0^b	0.01 ± 0^b	0 ± 0^ab	0 ± 0^a	0 ± 0^a	0 ± 0^a	0.001^**
Milk
g__Streptococcus	0.32 ± 0.03^a	0.16 ± 0.03^a	0.12 ± 0.04^a	26.63 ± 1.4^b	0.07 ± 0.01^a	0.09 ± 0.02^a	<0.001^***
g__Lactobacillus	1.79 ± 0.28^a	1.67 ± 0.77^a	1.16 ± 0.14^a	6.6 ± 1.28^b	1.04 ± 0.69^a	2.49 ± 1.73^a	<0.001^***
g__Enterococcus	2.49 ± 0.76^bc	1.39 ± 0.35^ab	1.76 ± 0.53^ac	3.73 ± 1.75^c	0.05 ± 0.01^a	0.1 ± 0.06^a	0.001^**
g__Bifidobacterium	0 ± 0.01	0 ± 0	0 ± 0.01	0.2 ± 0.31	0 ± 0	0 ± 0	0.352
g__Granulicatella	0.03 ± 0.01^ab	0.02 ± 0.01^ab	0.03 ± 0.01^ab	0.07 ± 0.03^b	0.01 ± 0.01^a	0.03 ± 0.04^ab	0.048^*
g__Aerococcus	0.01 ± 0^a	0 ± 0^a	0.01 ± 0^ab	0.04 ± 0.03^b	0 ± 0^a	0 ± 0^a	0.024^*
Feces (B_Feces, A_Feces)
g__Limnohabitans	0.01 ± 0.01^a	0.02 ± 0.02^a	0.15 ± 0.12^a	0.03 ± 0.03^a	8.44 ± 0.93^c	7.02 ± 0.06^b	<0.001^***
g__Bacteroides	1.45 ± 0.86^ab	2.16 ± 0.73^ab	3.61 ± 0.69^ac	0.53 ± 0.23^a	7.3 ± 2.95^c	4.96 ± 0.59^bc	0.001^**
g__Acinetobacter	0.03 ± 0.01^a	0.03 ± 0.02^a	0.04 ± 0.01^a	0.07 ± 0.06^a	5.75 ± 1.98^b	2.75 ± 2.48^ab	0.001^**
g__Parabacteroides	0.54 ± 0.33^ab	0.72 ± 0.36^ab	0.86 ± 0.2^ab	0.22 ± 0.1^a	4.12 ± 1.76^c	2.33 ± 0.17^bc	<0.001^***
g__Fusobacterium	0.01 ± 0^a	0 ± 0^a	0.01 ± 0^a	0 ± 0^a	2 ± 0.37^b	3.08 ± 0.47^c	<0.001^***
g__Giesbergeria	0 ± 0^a	0 ± 0^a	0.03 ± 0.02^a	0.01 ± 0.02^a	1.13 ± 0.17^b	1.14 ± 0.19^b	<0.001^***
g__Methanobrevibacter	0.4 ± 0.3^a	0.38 ± 0.14^a	0.31 ± 0.08^a	0.47 ± 0.28^a	0.67 ± 0.22^ab	1.14 ± 0.15^b	0.004^**
g__Prevotella	0.11 ± 0.04^a	0.11 ± 0.03^a	0.07 ± 0.03^a	0.05 ± 0.02^a	0.7 ± 0.29^b	0.63 ± 0.08^b	<0.001^***
g__Oscillospira	0.15 ± 0.07^a	0.11 ± 0.03^a	0.08 ± 0.03^a	0.05 ± 0.03^a	0.43 ± 0.08^b	0.54 ± 0.04^b	<0.001^***
g__Ruminococcus	0.15 ± 0.05^a	0.14 ± 0.02^a	0.13 ± 0.02^a	0.04 ± 0.01^a	0.34 ± 0.04^b	0.44 ± 0.08^b	<0.001^***
g__[Prevotella]	0.05 ± 0.03^a	0.03 ± 0^a	0.03 ± 0^a	0.02 ± 0.01^a	0.09 ± 0.02^a	0.23 ± 0.08^b	<0.001^***
g__Desulfovibrio	0.03 ± 0.01^a	0.02 ± 0^a	0.01 ± 0.01^a	0.02 ± 0.01^a	0.08 ± 0.01^b	0.13 ± 0.02^c	<0.001^***
g__Peptococcus	0.04 ± 0.02^ac	0.03 ± 0.01^ab	0.02 ± 0.01^a	0.03 ± 0.02^ac	0.07 ± 0.01^c	0.06 ± 0.02^bc	0.006^**

The data were expressed as the mean values ± standard deviation (SD).

The p values were determined using Anova test (^*p < 0.05; ^**p < 0.01; ^***p < 0.001).

^a,b,cRepresents different superscripts differed significantly (p < 0.05).

The major genera were arranged in order of abundance at each dietary protein medium