Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Body Image. 2022 Mar 2;41:109–127. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.01.010

Table 3a.

Multiple regression analyses with demographic factors predicting sexuality-related body image and sex frequency.

Sex Appeal Nude Appearance Satisfaction Sexual Acceptability
All
β
Men
β
Women
β
All
β
Men
β
Women
β
All
β
Men
β
Women
β
Gender −0.02 −0.24 * ** −0.16 * **
BMI −0.43 * ** −0.33 * ** −0.50 * ** −0.47 * ** −0.38 * ** .56 * ** −0.27 * ** −0.21 * ** −0.32 * **
BMI2 .00 −0.05 * ** .05 * ** .04 * ** −0.03 * ** .11 * ** .00 −0.04 * ** .04 * **
Age −0.05 * ** −0.07 * ** −0.04 * ** −0.06 * ** −0.05 * ** −0.06 * ** −0.01 −0.03 * .01
Education .05 * ** .02 .06 * ** .04 * ** .00 .06 * ** .02 * ** .01 .02
Hispanic .10 * .02 .19 * * .07 .04 .09 .16 * ** .14 * .18 * *
Black .40 * ** .41 * ** .40 * ** .37 * ** .36 * ** .37 * ** .30 * ** .33 * ** .29 * **
Asian −0.23 * ** −0.16 * ** −0.30 * ** −0.17 * ** −0.18 * ** −0.18 * ** −0.02 −0.04 .00
Other Race .12 * ** .11 * .12 * * .03 .04 .03 .05 .07 .03
Gay/Lesbian −0.07 −0.07 −0.06 −0.05 −0.11 .00 −0.13 * * −0.27 * ** −0.01
Bisexual .02 −0.15 * .07 .00 −0.14 * .04 −0.11 * * −0.14 * −0.09 *
Other −0.26 * ** −0.25 −0.25 * * −0.11 −0.44 * * −0.02 −0.20 * * −0.21 −0.19 *
Not Involved −0.31 * ** −0.35 * ** −0.28 * ** −0.26 * ** −0.32 * ** −0.19 * ** −0.53 * ** −0.57 * ** −0.50 * **
Widowed −0.37 * ** −0.17 −0.44 * ** −0.01 .21 −0.07 −0.32 * * .06 −0.46 * **
Dating Multiple .42 * ** .46 * ** .35 * ** .38 * ** .40 * ** .31 * ** .13 * .21 * * .00
Adjusted. R 2 .23 * ** .21 * ** .25 * ** .24 * ** .21 * ** .26 * ** .14 * ** .15 * ** .13 * **
Sexual Enjoyment Sex Frequency
All
β
Men
β
Women
β
All
β
Men
β
Women
β
Gender −0.17 * ** −0.10 * **
BMI −0.25 * ** −0.19 * ** −0.29 * ** −0.04 * ** −0.02 −0.05 * *
BMI2 .00 −0.03 * ** .03 * ** −0.01 −0.02 * .01
Age −0.02 * −0.04 * * .00 −0.12 * ** −0.12 * ** −0.13 * **
Education .01 .00 .02 −0.05 * ** −0.03 * * −0.06 * **
Hispanic .13 * * .13 * .12 .14 * ** .14 * .15 *
Black .30 * ** .31 * ** .28 * ** .24 * ** .23 * ** .25 * **
Asian −0.01 −0.03 .02 −0.09 * −0.01 −0.17 * **
Other Race .06 .07 −0.10 .10 * ** .09 .11 * *
Gay/Lesbian −0.14 * * −0.23 * ** −0.05 −0.11 * .02 −0.25 * **
Bisexual −0.09 * * −0.16 * −0.06 .02 .04 .02
Other −0.13 −0.20 −0.10 −0.32 * ** −0.43 * * .26 * *
Not Involved −0.57 * ** −0.64 * ** −0.50 * ** −0.90 * ** −0.84 * ** −0.97 * **
Widowed −0.30 * * .05 −0.43 * ** −0.46 * ** −0.17 −0.58 * **
Dating Multiple .20 * ** .23 * ** .13 .22 * ** .41 * ** −0.10 * **
Adjusted. R 2 .13 * ** .15 * ** .12 * ** .17 * ** .17 * ** .18 * **

Note.

* **

p < .001,

* *

p < .01,

*

p < .05.

In the dummy codes, the category coded as 0 were: men for gender, White for race, heterosexual for sexual orientation, and in a relationship for relationship status. Positive βs indicated greater sexuality-related body image and negative βs indicated lower sexuality-related body image. For example, looking at results for satisfaction with nude appearance, women were less satisfied than men (β = −0.24), people with high BMIs mass were less satisfied than people with low BMIs (β = −0.47), and Blacks were more satisfied than Whites (β = 0.37).