TABLE 4.
NHR | CAD |
Severe CAD |
||||||
Total |
SD |
Total |
SD |
|||||
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
Model 1a | 1.37 | 1.23–1.52 | 1.73 | 1.44–2.08 | 1.42 | 1.27–1.59 | 1.85 | 1.52–2.25 |
Model 2b | 1.29 | 1.14–1.44 | 1.55 | 1.27–1.91 | 1.42 | 1.26–1.59 | 1.84 | 1.50–2.26 |
Model 3c | 1.26 | 1.12–1.42 | 1.50 | 1.21–1.86 | 1.42 | 1.26–1.61 | 1.86 | 1.50–2.30 |
Model 4d | 1.21 | 1.07–1.38 | 1.41 | 1.12–1.77 | 1.42 | 1.26–1.60 | 1.85 | 1.50–2.29 |
Data were obtained using a binary logistic regression model.
aUnadjusted.
bAdjusted for sex, age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking status.
cModel 2 and additional adjustment for LDL-C, HbA1c, Cr, and CRP.
dModel 3 and additional adjustment for intake of aspirin, statin and hypoglycemic drugs.
NHR, neutrophil to HDL-C ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.