Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 19;3(11):100785. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100785

Table 2.

Pathologic response of three neoadjuvant schedules

Overall (N = 253) NAC.NICB (N = 98) NAC (N = 107) NICB (N = 48) p value
Pathological response 0.002
CR 50 (19.8%) 31 (31.6%) 12 (11.2%) 7 (14.6%)
PR 72 (28.5%) 28 (28.6%) 34 (31.8%) 10 (20.8%)
SD 100 (39.5%) 31 (31.6%) 43 (40.2%) 26 (54.2%)
PD 31 (12.3%) 8 (8.2%) 18 (16.8%) 5 (10.4%)
CR response 0.001
CR 50 (19.8%) 31 (31.6%) 12 (11.2%) 7 (14.6%)
Non-CR 203 (80.2%) 67 (68.4%) 95 (88.8%) 41 (85.4%)
Binary response 0.007
Responder (CR + PR) 122 (48.2%) 59 (60.2%) 46 (43.0%) 17 (35.4%)
Nonresponder (SD + PD) 131 (51.8%) 39 (39.8%) 61 (57.0%) 31 (64.6%)
DCR response 0.153
DCR 222 (87.7%) 90 (91.8%) 89 (83.2%) 43 (89.6%)
Non-DCR 31 (12.3%) 8 (8.2%) 18 (16.8%) 5 (10.4%)

NAC.NICB: combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy; NAC: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NICB: neoadjuvant immunotherapy; CR: complete response; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; PD: progression disease. DCR: disease control rate.