Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 15;14(11):8215–8224.

Table 2.

Treatment effects of the two groups were compared (n%)

Group n Basically cured Significantly effective Effective Invalid Total effective rate
Conventional treatment 50 3 (6.0) 8 (16.0) 14 (28.0) 25 (50.0) 25 (50.0)
Combined treatment 50 8 (16.0) 13 (26.0) 19 (38.0) 10 (20.0) 40 (80.0)
Z -3.266
P 0.001