Table 3.
Functional scores of the two groups were compared (x ± s)
| Group | n | NDS | BI | FCA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Conventional treatment | 50 | 25.76±4.60 | 18.98±4.66 | 49.80±4.82 | 65.16±5.64 | 31.80±3.46 | 45.12±5.84 |
| Combined treatment | 50 | 25.84±4.33 | 14.96±5.66 | 50.82±5.73 | 80.72±7.15 | 32.16±3.76 | 64.80±6.87 |
| t | 0.089 | 3.876 | 0.963 | 12.080 | 0.498 | 15.434 | |
| P | 0.929 | < 0.001 | 0.338 | < 0.001 | 0.620 | < 0.001 | |
Notes: NDS, Neurological Deficit Scores; BI, Barthel Index; FCA, Functional Comprehensive Assessment.