Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 23;9(11):e37394. doi: 10.2196/37394

Table 4.

Differences in baseline positive affect (t–1), stress reactivity (t0), and affective recovery (average deviation of positive affect from baseline levels during t1 – t2) between groupsa.

Stress type At-risk versus controls Patients versus controls Patients versus at-risk

b (95% CI) P value b (95% CI) P value b (95% CI) P value
Activity stress






t–1 –0.34 (–0.57 to –0.11) .003b –0.74 (–0.95 to –0.54) <.001b –0.40 (–0.60 to –0.21) <.001b

t0 0.06 (–0.15 to 0.27) .57 0.11 (–0.07 to 0.29) .23 0.05 (–0.13 to 0.23) .58

t1–t2 –0.01 (–0.21 to 0.18) .89 0.05 (–0.12 to 0.22) .57 0.06 (–0.11 to 0.23) .46
Event stressc






t0 –0.07 (–0.19 to 0.05) .27 –0.09 (–0.19 to 0.03) .13 –0.02 (–0.13 to 0.09) .76
Composite stress






t–1 –0.28 (–0.43 to –0.13) <.001b –0.44 (–0.57 to –0.31) <.001b –0.44 (–0.57 to –0.31) <.001b

t0 –0.06 (–0.17 to 0.06) .35 –0.06 (–0.16 to 0.05) .30 0.001 (–0.10 to 0.11) .99

t1–t2 0.01 (–0.10 to 0.12) .89 0.02 (–0.07 to 0.12) .62 0.02 (–0.08 to 0.11) .74

aAdjusted for age and gender.

bSignificant after Simes correction.

cModel for t–1 did not converge.